The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. ( pounds sterling)
The chart below illustrates how much money is spent on 5 customer goods between france and The uk in 2010. Units are measured in pounds sterling.
Looking at the graph it is clearly obvious that the expenditure of the uk on cars , books , cameras was higher than france. However, the amount of money in uk spent on computers and perfume was less than france.
In term of cars, The most money spent on this consumer good was the highest amount around 450k in the uk and this similar trend was witnessed in the france approximately 400k. In the uk, the expenditure on books was almost 410k which was higher than france, at 300k. Then, The amount of money spent on cameras was not exceptional that france reached the low number at 150k while the uk spent around 360k on it.
Next, The french spent on computers approximately 375k which was a bit higher than the uk (350k pounds). Finally, The British tended to purchase perfume less than the amount the french spent on this product (200k pounds).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | truongquangwt | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | amandeep kaur randhawa | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | amandeep kaur randhawa | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | amandeep kaur randhawa | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | amandeep kaur randhawa | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make a comparison where relevant. 73
- writing task 1: the birth rates of China and America 56
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. ( pounds sterling) 73
- The pie chart shows a comparision of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 61
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s that the expenditure of the uk on cars , books , cameras was higher than france....
^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he expenditure of the uk on cars , books , cameras was higher than france. However...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, look, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63276836158 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33352430107 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508474576271 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.018513758 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1111111111 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0879712100501 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482110594168 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062209926815 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076209503442 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890397274793 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.