When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
there are wider believes concern the key point in designing an edifice is usage instead of its apperance. In my opinion, I partly agree with such idea.
First of all, I deem that the intended use of a building is a critical issue because certain structure will fit with particular usage. For example, comparing a school including three to four floor whose main purpose is education with a skyscrapper which is used for citizens accomodation, there will be a different design in the foundation. The foundation of the skyscrapper must meet specific conditions in architecture, so that it is firm and stable enough to be able to construct extra floors whereas the school’s foundation requires a small standard. Knowing the intended use of the edifice will assist the architect in finding an approriate base for the whole building, therefore, the construction of the edifice will be more firm and more safety.
In contrast, the outside designing also play an important role in modern architect nowadays. edifice with particular shapes commonly favors by the mankind as for its unique appearance. For instance, the Twins Tower in Malaysia is one of the country tourist attraction partly due to its outward apperance. because of that reason, many investors have requires a luxury, classy or extraodinary outward for their own building in order to easily achieve commercial purpose. The building with an attractive outlook will be more impressive than ones whose not.
In conclusion, both the intent to use and the outlook of the building are important in constructing an edifice in general. However, as I predicted that in the future, the intention use of the building will be the only critical matter when drafting a model edifice.
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy andthe other joining two Japanese islands. 61
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
there are wider believes concern the key poin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Edifice
...tant role in modern architect nowadays. edifice with particular shapes commonly favors ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...on partly due to its outward apperance. because of that reason, many investors have req...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, whereas, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in general, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14436619718 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88683223226 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.728493612 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.384615385 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1538461538 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175795267283 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647978545953 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261688720713 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108541209435 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259200376265 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.