The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart indicates the percentage of five different age groups 18-25, 26-35, 36-50, 51-65 and more than 65 years old people offering donations to charity during 1990 and 2010 in Britain.
Overall, people offering money to charity work is higher in age group of 36-50 (1990) whereas much lower in group 18-25 years old (2010). The charitable offering declined in 2010 by three age groups and risen by two age groups compared to year 1990.
In year 1990, the age group of 18-25 offered 18% of charitable funds which was higher in 26-35 and 36-50 groups (31% and 41% respectively). However, in same year the age groups 51-65 and >65 offered lower amount to charity (35% and 32% respectively).
The amount given to charity foundations in 2010 were lowered to 6%, 24% and 35% by age groups 18-25, 26-35 and 36-50. In contrast, the percentage rised in 29% and 35% by 51-65 and >65 years old people compared to the year 1990.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-21 sashwini50 56 view
2019-08-01 danhvinh126 56 view
2019-06-20 Mishika sugandhi 78 view
2019-06-15 gizem33 67 view
2019-05-20 Jasmineeee 67 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user sashwini50 :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the percentage rised in 29% and 35% by 51-65 and >65 years old people compar...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 758.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67901234568 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31177578286 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475308641975 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 191.7 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6562837909 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.285714286 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165144762631 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108070100295 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383941801504 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133268924722 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336739113338 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.