Writing task 1: The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012

The graph shows information about how many female members of parliament in European countries over a twelve-year period between 2000 and 2012.

Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were considerable upward trends in the number of female participants of the UK and France, while this data of Germany, Belgium and Italy remained stable over the period in question. Another interesting point is that UK started off with a lower figure than Germany in 2000, but in 2012, Uk had the highest number than the others.

Looking at the details, as regards France, the percentage started at 5% in 2000, then there was a slight increase to almost 10% after four years, at which point it rose dramatically to 20% until 2008. Then the figure leveled off, finishing at around 21%. If we look at the UK, the trend was similar. Having risen at nearly over 30% in 2004, this number then leveled off at 31% un til 2008. Consequently, there was an upward movement to around 39% in 2012.

By contrast, the percentage of female members remained stable in Germany, Belgium and Italy over the period. The data showed that the figure for these three countries started at 33%, 25%, 22% and finished at 37%, 32%, 25% respectively. In 2010, the number of female members of parliament was the same for both Germany and the UK.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, look, then, while, as regards

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75652173913 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46708387282 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560869565217 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.137936624 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4545454545 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199233828501 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815394992052 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940426331967 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160625099943 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116769262311 0.0819641961636 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.