The chart shows the percentage of drugs taken by girls and boys in a school in New Zealand.
The bar chart illustrates the proportions of drugs used by school boys and school girls in a certain school in New Zealand. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, school boys are more likely to take drugs than school girls in the school mentioned. Additionally, hashish or marijuana was the most used drug whilst LSD and medial drugs are the least used drugs by both sexes.
To begin with, the figure for the percentage of school boys taking hashish or marijuana was around 32% as opposed to just approximately 28% for school girls. Conversely, as many as roughly 4% of school boys using LSD and medical drugs in comparison to more or less than 1% for school girls.
Notably, school boys were more prone to drug abuse than school girls, except for cocaine which was taken at the same level by both genders. The differences between two sexes were 5%, 2%, 3%, 3%, and 1% for hashish or marijuana; amphetamines; heroin, opium or morphine; LSD and medial drugs; and solvents, correspondingly.
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- HIghest level of education of women in someland 67
- The bar chart shows the monthly spending in dollars of a family in the USA on three items in 2010. 67
- The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an English town in 2012 79
- Human activity has had a negative effect on plants and animal all over the world. Some people think that it is too late to do something about it. Others think that there is still time to take effective action. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l drugs; and solvents, correspondingly.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, so, except for, more or less, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86470588235 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66574450607 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547058823529 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6246246229 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.375 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393742695669 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181145573139 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154420063619 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267764708396 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116016822257 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.