The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.

The given chart deals with the statistics of house prices average change in different cities from 1990 to 2002 based on an average houses cost in 1989. The graphs indicates cities such as New York, Mardrid, Tokyo, Frankfurt and London. Moreover, the prices chnages shows in percentages.

Overall, In USA house prices increased around 12% from 1996 to 2002. Whereas, Japan and UK decreased with a proximity of 7 percent from 1990 to 1995.

Firstlly, The houses cost in Spain and Germany increased when compared to 1989. Madrid never had a fall over the 12 years. on the other hand Frankfurt had fall from 1996 to 2002 but not much.

Secondly, New York, Tokyo and Japan had a negative precentage till 1995. From 1996 onwards New York and London start hiking their prices when it comes to Tokyo it remains in negative

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-13 Ahmad_off view
2023-10-13 Ahmad_off view
2023-10-13 Ahmad_off view
2022-11-27 kdyn129 84 view
2022-08-11 Blueberry123 80 view
Essays by user siva Pra :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'indicate'.
Suggestion: indicate
...average houses cost in 1989. The graphs indicates cities such as New York, Mardrid, Tokyo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...rid never had a fall over the 12 years. on the other hand Frankfurt had fall from ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, whereas, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 684.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81690140845 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28394949866 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605633802817 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 187.2 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3046071463 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.4 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335907110833 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122858794778 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157662128778 0.0843802449381 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199456071718 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17424410808 0.0819641961636 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.08 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.