Now, a lot of people are doing an academic study. We should encourage them to learn vocational skills (like plumbers and electricians). Do you agree or disagree?
Educational concerns vary from one family to another. Some parents prefer their youngsters to finish their university study and build up a robust academic background. However, others argue that tertiary education is insignificant after completing high school's study. This essay will shed a light on both views, and overall opinion will be provided.
On the one hand, many families support that vocational skills are more rewarding than academies ones. Their point is that adolescents become more dependent on their own because they can support themselves financially. They will not be a burden for their parents anymore. In addition to this, they will be more responsible for facing life courageously. The more money they earned, the more success will be proven in performing these practical skills. Hence, vocational skills are principally considered more profitable to many school-aged students.
On the other hand, opponents to this claim that academic qualifications provide students with various golden merits. Firstly, the labor market becomes increasingly competitive. For instance, the vast majority of applicants are being applied to one position in a company. Accordingly, people with no university degree will gain no chances, while those who have an academic distinction will fundamentally get the position. In addition to this, University graduates will undoubtedly receive higher salaries than their counters with non-academic certificates. Thus, university education grants many advantages for their followers. I strongly support this view.
To sum up, Learning vocational skills are supposed to be optional, while holding an academic degree should be a must. I believe that academic persons have better choices and high standards of livings. It is hoped that parents continually encourage their young people to follow up on their academic career.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-24 | GT Eltaher | 78 | view |
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions. Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
- Now, a lot of people are doing an academic study. We should encourage them to learn vocational skills (like plumbers and electricians). Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual persons to address. On other words, we have reached a stage where the only way to protect the environment is at an international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree with 89
- Environmental problems such as pollution and climatic variations are increasing nowadays The governments have taken some measures at a global level But they get only a few solutions Why is it so How can this problem be solved 95
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions. Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69285714286 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92176910345 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614285714286 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7193314685 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.7 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103371262464 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0311070124488 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043628373972 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075253983844 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614964302943 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.13 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.