There is remarkable evidence that consuming a limitless measure of sugar is a distinctive assumption for medicinal problems. As a result, a continuing controversy has arisen over what is the primary reason behind this dilemma. While some people attribute it to the government to monopolize the excesses of sugar in local trades, others would contend that it is people who are in charge of this beyond excessing of sugar in their regimes. I strongly believe that people play a pivotal role in their lief.
Many groups of persons recommend that the government has a great deal of power and influence over the administrative system to regulate applicable rules strickly to tackle this worrying trend. For example, most of the institutions have a considerable impact over the markets to increase tariffs on sugar imports. Besides, It can also control over access to sugar by levying taxes on production. It suggested that the government should expand its educational infrastructure in their societies. Then raise the awareness of people, especially children, and adolescents, through mass media education programs may lead to diminishing buying an ample amount of sugar. If they educate people in terms of the detrimental effect of eating the amount of sugar on their health, definitely they will tend to quit it in the blink of an eye.
Contrary to popular belief, people should change their attitudes toward sugar overuse and also their eating habits. Countless scientific studies although have confirmed that a diet deficient in a shortage of sugar may have a significant and profounded effect on one's brain activity, other studies shed light on how the increasing sugar in daily intake raises blood pressure and diabetes in individuals. Therefore, people have to control daily sugar levels in their diet.
In my opinion, every single person has the responsibility for protecting their health food, overall people have to be conscious regarding the rate of sugar they consume every day.
- School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents to what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Excessive consumption of sugar causes many health related issues. Some people believe the government should control population's sugar intake while others think people themselves should be responsible for their sugar eating habits.Discuss both views and 11
- Excessive consumption of sugar causes many health related issues. Some people believe the government should control population's sugar intake while others think people themselves should be responsible for their sugar eating habits.Discuss both views and 78
- Many people believe that the increasing number of cars in cities is the biggest source of pollution and waste. Others think that industries are the ones causing pollution. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents to what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...o sugar by levying taxes on production. it suggested that the government should ex...
^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... blood pressure and diabetes in people. Therefore people have to control daily sugar leve...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, for example, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18709677419 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78774634008 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570967741935 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5539939728 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.2 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429331794768 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138427783196 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767402160316 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251418653784 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036005282951 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.