Governments are not justified in circumventing civil laws in the name of national security
Civil laws are important for humane treatment of all the citizens of a nation. These laws provide fundamental rights to people of all backgrounds in most countries. Civil laws are protected by the constitution and it is extremely difficult to amend these laws under normal circumstances. However, in a lot of countries, these laws can be exploited under the banner of national emergency or national security. Governments are not justified in circumventing civil laws in the name of national security. Compromising civil laws can have detrimental effects on the future of a nation. It can even lead to military coups and lead the way for authoratrian regimes.
In recent history, there were many attempts across the world to suspend civil laws under the banner of national security. Some of the countires like Iraq succeded while others like Pakistan (1999) and Turkey (2016) failed to do so. A lot of countires in the middle east have still not recovered from the irrational decisions made by their governments. These countries are in total shambles today. When government suspends civil laws for the sake of national security, we often see massive protests. People destroy the public property and lawlessness in the country increases. The government orders the military to supress people’s voice- this is how dictators are born. Government are servants of the people and they should respect people’s mandate but unfortunately, in many countires, people don’t have a choice.
Suspending civil laws is not necessarily the right approach to protect the national security. During a national emergency, the government suspends the internet, controlles the media and imposes curfew on the people. The people don’t trust their own government. In such a situation, people demand independence from the regime. This paves the way to militant groups. Uproar in Kashmir, Ukraine are testimony to this claim
In conclusion, government can never be justified for suspending civil laws under any circumstance. People deserve to know what is going on in the country and government should try to work with people and not sideline them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-04 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-12 | Swarnali Swarno | 50 | view |
| 2022-11-12 | Swarnali Swarno | 75 | view |
| 2022-10-15 | srilakshmip05 | 33 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | ojehparvaz | 58 | view |
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 62
- Claim Scholastic art and music programs are so important that the government should fund those programs in schools that cannot afford them Reason Students who study art and music are more likely to succeed than those who do not 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition 50
- Governments are not justified in circumventing civil laws in the name of national security 100
- When Stanley Park first opened, it was the largest, most heavily used public park in town. It is still the largest park, but it is no longer heavily used. Video cameras mounted in the park's parking lots last month revealed the park's drop in po 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... under the banner of national security. Some of the countires like Iraq succeded while othe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32743362832 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95795936175 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522123893805 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2940268374 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.0909090909 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4090909091 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22727272727 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376409566441 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121977299388 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168527070294 0.0758088955206 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232121246293 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114173124461 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.