College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
The author of the statement stated that the College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. Many of us may argue that it will hold all the time, while others may counter this by providing examples. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the statement and will provide sound reasoning for the same.
The desire of most of the students is to secure a good after completing the college and for that reason choosing a field, where jobs are available is not a bad idea because the ultimate goal is to get a job. But the question is that, should we ignore or corner our interest in getting a Job? According to me, we should not ignore them because we have dreamt about them for years, we want to see ourselves to succeed in that field and just for sake of a job we have changed our interest is not the right decision.
Secondly, the availability of jobs in particular area doesn't mean that everybody who is pursuing degree in that college will get the job, For example, In India many students opt to Computer science in engineering because India IT sector is producing a lot of jobs but everyone who has passed out from the college is getting job in this field. So, the availability of a job does not mean you will get that job.
Moreover, if you pursue the field of your interest, then firstly you won't regret your life and secondly, you will work in that field with more enthusiasm, commitment and chance of succeed in life will very high when compare to the fields in which you are not interested. Their future will be bright and by study programs as per interest, one will achieve real success irrespective of a job opportunity or pay scale.
In a nutshell, we can say the primary purpose for most of the students after completing the college is to get a good job, but that does not mean that they have to study that field only where the jobs are available. They have to study that field in which they are interested or want to make the future in a particular field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | sandeshbhandari2 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | shingwa | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | lucy2244 | 79 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | christine_cui | 54 | view |
- major cities 54
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 50
- Technology 75
- government must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive 66
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...r corner our interest in getting a Job? According to me, we should not ignore them because we h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 55, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...availability of jobs in particular area doesnt mean that everybody who is pursuing deg...
^^^^^^
Line 19, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty or pay scale. In a nutshell, we can say the primary purpose for most ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for example, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44562334218 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39820072474 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456233421751 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 524.7 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.1087368657 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.666666667 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4166666667 23.4991977007 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 5.21951772744 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452712316084 0.243740707755 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196406873585 0.0831039109588 236% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.208770716924 0.0758088955206 275% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259562656849 0.150359130593 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689549770871 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.