Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Currently, many companies employed those who has a good appearance for the success. While there are some benefits, I would argue that it is better to focus on the productivity of work.
On the one hand, some organizations believe that their employees should wear on fashionable clothes at work for some reasons. The first one that since it is company or professional business, the agent might be asked for formal uniform because of politeness. If they have a meeting or the customers directly, they should have a good manner and be respectful. Additionally, the members will make good impressions with the counterparts as well as the other companies. For example, when the staffs dress nicely in a conference, they might show the professional and specialist.
On the other hand, I find that it is better idea for employees to take more time on the quality of work. Firstly, the chairmen value the capacity and take good care of their work, they might increase their effectiveness as well as achievements. For instance, when paying attention and be cautious to the plans, projects, they might develop the system. Secondly, along with the concentration on work, they might be expert on the field. A company might be more successful when they have a huge source of the products. Finally, aiming attention at the quality might attract more customers and the counterparts therefore bringing back lots of achievements.
To sum up, while there are some advantages of employees dressing beautifully to work, they had better pay most of attention to the productivity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | MustafaR | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | kamalcalc1977 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | kamalcalc1977 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | kamalcalc1977 | 11 | view |
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 82
- The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000 67
- Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance. 56
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given. 11
- In June 1996, an experimental flu vaccine was trialled in a large country town on females only. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1007751938 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95164645815 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523255813953 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.7875551468 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.0 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228375489266 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807955233461 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947280354824 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137179073278 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463607352351 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.