The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 - 2002.
Three different types of the United Kingdom’s phone call durations between 1995 and 2002 are illustrated in the graph. Overall, there were two kinds of telephone call (cellular and national and international) experienced an increasing trend, while the local call was fluctuate. In addition, the highest number of phone call duration was observed in 1999.
The local – fixed-line witnessed as the biggest number in the reported years. In the first years, it stood at approximately 70 million. Then, in three following years (1996 to 1999), the figure showed a similar pattern, increasing at around 5 million a year, and, reached to the peak number in 1999 (90 million). Following which, the figure decreased steadily and ending the period at around 85 million in 2002.
In 1995, the figure for the national and international call was half that of the local. Then, it saw a slight increase (around 4 million per year) from 1996 to 2001 and finished 65 million in the last year. Furthermore, the figure for the mobile call was the lowest among the group. it stood just below 5 million in 1995 and finished for just about 48 million in 2002.
- The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer's total car sales in different regions from 2006 to 2010. 73
- People sleep less than before. Why? and what are the effects of this? 73
- People Participate in IELTS Program in 6 English Courses in Pare, 2016 11
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fluctuated'.
Suggestion: fluctuated
...reasing trend, while the local call was fluctuate. In addition, the highest number of pho...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...le call was the lowest among the group. it stood just below 5 million in 1995 and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88144329897 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66193572352 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561855670103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3003264809 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0909090909 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172944901886 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681150112872 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401555839625 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119221761041 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415346962801 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.