The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
The pie charts given illustrate the proportion of how energy consumption and greenhouse emission production in Australian household result.
Overall, there are three household activities which are responsible for the largest amount of energy consumption and the production of greenhouse gas in australia namely heating, water heating, and other appliances.
Generally, the heating accounts the most significant proportion of energy consumption, more than a two – fifth. Followed by water heating and other appliances contributed to more than a quarter and less than a fifth respectively . The three remaining activities (refrigeration, lighting and, cooling) share the minority of the proportions.
The second figure shown separates five household activities in australia that produce greenhouse gas emission. The main contributors to the production of greenhouse gas emission are water heating and other appliances, where shares almost similar number (32% and 28% each). Furthermore, heating accounts for less than a fifth and refrigeration, lighting and cooling contribute to small percentages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-01 | Biamsaul | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | hobaokhuyen | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | wardiati | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-05 | Ashraf Elyazid Elsayed Abdelrazig | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | cocococo123 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 73
- The graph and table below show the changes in the number of overseas visitors and top 5 visitor countries to Britain in 2004 and 2005. 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 78
- The circular chart reveals the four main courses of land degradation and the tobular chart illustrates the different regions during the year of 1990. It shows the percentum. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...arter and less than a fifth respectively . The three remaining activities refriger...
^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'activities'' or 'activity's'?
Suggestion: activities'; activity's
...ifth respectively . The three remaining activities refrigeration, lighting and, cooling sh...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...a that produce greenhouse gas emission. The main contributors to the production of ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9872611465 4.92477711251 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21660987281 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56050955414 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1869858279 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182902744595 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855283651429 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100195766436 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142821077219 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1079023222 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 11.4140731707 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.