Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is true that visiting online museums and visual art galleries is becoming increasingly popular in recent years. Some people hold the view that we could shut down public museums and other physical art centers. Personally, I completely disagree with this idea for several reasons.
The obvious argument in its favor is that public museums could serve as better cultural hubs than online exhibitions. These sites are not only the place to see the artworks but also offer a perfect spot for people to meet each other with the same interest and an ideal place to hold public activities and events. For example, US Annual Charity Dinner is held in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York each September, as well as fashion gala takes place in Greenwich Village of Manhattan district. These events make it possible for people in the same profession to meet each other.
I would argue the reason for keeping the museums and art galleries may involve the recognition that onsite exhibitions offer a better experience in terms of light effects and exhibition arrangements. The artworks and antiques fit in with exhibition room and natural settings, which provides a marvelous effect for tourists. Namely, the surroundings and atmospheres are also part of the display. Unlike online websites, they just simply present us pictures and three-dimensional models. It is absurd to argue the experience is the same that see a picture of the Great Wall and standing right at the site of its ancient ruins.
Besides, a lot of people who work in these public facilities could become unemployed if they were shut down. And a considerable amount of government income generated by admission fees would disappear.
In conclusion, public museums and art centers have their own unparalleled values. It is unwise and even stupid to replace them with online exhibitions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-22 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | qiuleimin | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | kakaloc1681998 | 89 | view |
- Some parents want their children to read only serious educational books at all times, and they think it is a waste of time to read any entertainments books.What is your opinion about this? 67
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- Some parents want their children to read only serious educational books at all times, and they think it is a waste of time to read any entertainments books.What is your opinion about this? 84
- Some parents want their children to read only serious educational books at all times, and they think it is a waste of time to read any entertainments books.What is your opinion about this? 78
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, governments pay partly or all education fees. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13770491803 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75815470214 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586885245902 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6610459758 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9375 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225789627524 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682753834517 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549786599542 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129629019476 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687659984884 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.