Some people think spending on arts is a waste of money rather than a budget should be diverted to other public services. Do you agree or disagree?
Arts play an indispensable role in depicting the culture and tradition of the country. Expenditure on artistic activities is considered as an act of squandering by a group of individuals. I agree with the notion and believe that funds should be diverted to the other factors such as health care, transport, education but not on the cost of arts.
There are ample reasons why the government should diversify the budget towards the other developments. First and foremost reason is inefficient public services. To explain it further, developing cities need efficient transport system, modern education, and world-class health care to improve the quality of life. A financial crisis is the second reason on which the government should ponder upon. Non-availability of funds has forced many organizations to give pink slips to their employees. For instance, A recent example of Jet airways which closed down its operations due to bankruptcy. Hence, diversifying funds on other factors can aid in improving the standard of living as well as burgeoning economic growth.
Nevertheless, financing arts too is essential. Different forms of art can attract tourists from across the world which in turn can assist in boosting the economy. Travelers who admire the beauty of arts flock to take a glimpse; consequently, helping in generating revenue for the economy. Another predominant thought for allocating funds for arts is it generates employment. Different art based-activities such as singing, dancing, music, theatre employ huge number of people to make it successful. Therefore to promote tourism and to create jobs opportunities it is necessary that some funds be allocated in favor of arts.
To recapitulate, although diversification of funds towards the other factors is imperative, arts should also be given some importance for the benefit of the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-03 | sameersomaya | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | sameersomaya | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | sbsomaya | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | sbsomaya | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | sbsomaya | 84 | view |
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some scientists think there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Others think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- In today’s competitive world, many families find it necessary for both parents go out to work. While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income, others feel they lack support because of their parents’ absence. Discuss b 73
- the process of generation of electricity 61
- Nowadays traffic is a serious problem in big cities Why this is so and what effects does it bring 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 500, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...number of people to make it successful. Therefore to promote tourism and to create jobs o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, as for, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46896551724 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15285575399 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627586206897 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7220846957 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2941176471 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188233229352 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542723526936 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498295480053 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115958582903 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259387111858 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.