dinosaurs endotherms
The reading expressed some reasons to prove that dinosaurs were endotherm. This hypothesis has not been accepted by some scholars due to some reasons which the professor at the lecture mentioned. following sentences will describe the summary of reading reasons and its corresponding opposite opinions which mentioned at the lecture.
First, the assumption that as there are some fossils found at the polar region prove that they were endotherms, has been rejected. First, the professor said that at that time those places could be not as colder as this time in all seasons and even if colder seasons they could migrate to warmer places.
Second, the reading claimed that if these animals were not endotherms they should have legs which were located at places like others reptile, corocoodail for instance. However, the professor said that this type of legs allows these animals to support heavyweight and can resist more under their gravitational weight as they grow.
Finally, the passage said that the presence of Haversian canals would be a proval evidence for these animals being endotherms. But, as mentioned in the lecture the professor said that although it is true that these dinosaurs had Haversian canals and grow fast, it did not confirm they were endotherms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | saamaan | 86 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | TiOluwani97 | 80 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | joeyrussell007 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | tststs | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | nusybah | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Following
...the professor at the lecture mentioned. following sentences will describe the summary of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, for instance, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 206.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2427184466 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5323433315 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553398058252 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4683604359 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110941493844 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623269486158 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118253085168 0.0662205650399 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0638841616451 0.162205337803 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486392462445 0.0443174109184 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.