In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could. Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?

The number of household waste has become more in recent times. More than eight million tonnes of chemical waste were produced in the previos year all around the world which is one of the primary reasons of enviromantal phenomenons. This essay will firstly discuss why people are not willing to recycle their waste, and secondly suggest some measures to change it.
On the one hand, the number of recycled products is comparatively low due to two primary reasons. To begin with, many people are not aware of the importance of recycling. Many individuals who do not have illiteracy skills have no idea about climate change which is a fatl worldwide problem. Further and more importantly, there are not any collection banks where used papers, bottles and plastics are gathered at to be converted into raw material. For example, more than two million tonnes of garbage were dumped into landfill sites in the UM due to scarcity of recycling bins there. If such facilities were available and common in cities, people would send broken computers, mobile phones and other electronic gadgeds there.

On the other hand, local govermens can take innumrable steps to alter it. First of all, they can itroduce laws to enable many people make money out of recycling. When it has become a way to earn money, they will not only separe their waste but also collect useful materials on Street which will dramatically increase the amount of recycled products. Secondly, people should be educated about detrimental consequences of desposing wastes. Enviromental issues and recycling ways can be a compulsory part of curriculum in high school so that they will become enviromentally friendly citizens in the near future. Lastly, they can be persuaded to purcahse recycled garments and electronic devices. Advertisers can maket hem use the second hand gadgeds rather than buying the latest model of smart phones. For instance, a study by Social MAN Magazine in 2017 reported that paper made up one third of municipal waste stream in Man ten years ago. After Tark who is world renowed singer has become endorser of Sun Papers Company which uses recycled paper as raw material has doubled its sales.

By way of conclusion, majority of people throw their household waste away rather than collecting them in separate rubbish bins which result in air and water pollution. There are not any adequate places to gather them in many cases and many individuals do not care about enviroments and its problems. Nonetheless, many measures can be taken tor everse it. I would argue that all governments must form a global network to recycle more.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 940, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ipal waste stream in Man ten years ago. After Tark who is world renowed singer has be...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, third, for example, for instance, first of all, in many cases, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2186.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 434.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03686635945 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58583661494 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594470046083 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5660322431 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3636363636 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68181818182 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236726685502 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063792920742 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518833579126 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136448132813 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244823765313 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.