Essay topics: TPO 19 - Integrated TOEFL essay
Actually, both the lecture and the passage make comment about buzzers who are recruited in order to advertise the product in diverse ways; actually, when companies encountered to the issue that people don't pay enough attention to their advertisement changed their methods. The article brings three hypothesized for revealing the claim that this method isn't logical; hence, exploiting buzzers is counted as a companies’ foible; nonetheless, the lecturer puts all reasons under question. According to the speakers, none of those are convincing.
First, as the passage mentioned, companies are lying to people for increasing the rate of selling; however, the lecturer dismissed the claim by emphasizing that a person who is employed for introducing a commodity have tried that; in other words, managers of company find buyers who believe that their product is helpful; therefore, they tell the true. the man exemplifies his self. He works in a phone company where he really has taken the advantages of its phone.
Next, the speaker declares that people who communicate with his ask many questions. If he doesn't answer to them they don't purchase the product; quite the opposite, the passage illustrates this as a negative point of the mentioned method.
Finally, as the text stated the society will be affected by buzzing adversely. Because people can't trust when they face people who are advertising and don't introduce themselves as a buzzer; moreover, they suggest a not useful manufactures; however, the man refutes the idea by adding the fact that people can trust better when they see the direct conceptuses of their shopping.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Yam Kumar Oli | 52 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | Dat_Nguyen | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | KerryFromHere | 3 | view |
| 2022-11-19 | rpinisetti8 | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | stupidfella | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...es encountered to the issue that people dont pay enough attention to their advertise...
^^^^
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...or revealing the claim that this method isnt logical; hence, exploiting buzzers is c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...helpful; therefore, they tell the true. the man exemplifies his self. He works in a...
^^^
Line 9, column 91, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...cate with his ask many questions. If he doesnt answer to them they dont purchase the p...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tions. If he doesnt answer to them they dont purchase the product; quite the opposit...
^^^^
Line 13, column 95, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ed by buzzing adversely. Because people cant trust when they face people who are adv...
^^^^
Line 13, column 152, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hey face people who are advertising and dont introduce themselves as a buzzer; moreo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, hence, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, really, so, therefore, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32567049808 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79456678211 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.82279173 49.2860985944 221% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 139.0 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.06452816374 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275831336136 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847984417854 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660096875379 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157910170134 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528527893557 0.0443174109184 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.