Unfortunately, the media tend to highlight what is sensational at the moment. Society would
be better served if the media reported or focused more fully on events and trends that will
ultimately have the most long-term significance.
The above notion is about the tendency of media at moment, and the purpose of serving society at best would be done if media focuses more fully on events and trends rather sensational. That above nation is appreciable but not thoroughly appreciated cause I found that second claim indefensible.
First of all, society bonds us all together to live like social being. That society must be served in a right way if we like to be benefited, and media plays a vital role in this scenario. Media confronts an person with the events that happen around him/her in every minute. Those events can help an individual to serve the society with the righteous way. Thus, media should focus fully on the news and events rather just be confined to the sensational one. Nevertheless, media, at the moment, is only focusing on the sensational events more than the events that are less attractive or entertaining. This practice of media is making people less likely to be balanced anyone is taking their decision of an event partly, which is leading that individual to take right move for the society he/she represents.
In addition, media is focusing on many vulgar events but ‘sensational’ to it’s view. As an instance, we can take a trashy talk show in account, where two parties or more gather only to sledging each other and nothing else. What would anyone learn from this kind of event? Media is confining us within it’s own interest by showing us what it tends to show rather that what we need to. If it does so, society is less benefited.
In some cases, media’s that indefensible tendency can be supported. As the world is getting developed, people are getting more swift without having enough time to subtly focus on any elaborated thing. Media, somehow in this case is helping people by focusing only on the sensational events. People are only heading towards those sensational news and moving way getting informed. That’s how it is now.
In conclusion, for a balanced society media should serve with elaborateness. Otherwise, people having shortly informed about an event, will come to a resolution that will just be futile and not been productive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-07 | hossainmehrub | 50 | view |
- Contemporary art (painting, music, literature, etc.) is absent from the lives of most people, since it is primarily created only for the enjoyment of other artists. Art should instead be created purely for popular understanding and appreciation. -GRE Issu 58
- Unfortunately, the media tend to highlight what is sensational at the moment. Society wouldbe better served if the media reported or focused more fully on events and trends that willultimately have the most long-term significance. 62
- Most cultures encourage individuals to sacrifice a large part of their own personalities in orderto be like other people. Thus, most people are afraid to think or behave differently becausethey do not want to be excluded. 58
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are the most critical of it. 70
- Students should memorize facts only after they have studied the ideas, trends, and conceptsthat help explain those facts. Students who have learned only facts have learned very little. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...cial being. That society must be served in a right way if we like to be benefited, and media p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... role in this scenario. Media confronts an person with the events that happen arou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00819672131 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78315002017 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532786885246 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8720608957 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2857142857 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333223864017 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10087718744 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875987188805 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188474921005 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638534270569 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.