Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
The topic education of student has been a long elusive one, people have been constantly changing curriculums, introducing new rules and systems and than dissembling that very same rule. And university education itself, has not been spared from this ever shifting education dilemma. From the outskirts it may seem simple, university should be educating students to a specific field. But with the onset of real life deleriums, the situation does not seem so straight forward.
In university student wants to master a particular course. So learning a different course could be a distraction and sometimes may even become a hindrance to the original intended field of study. For example, many student cannot deal with the burden of analysing Shakespear while concurrent solving partial differential equation, and thus may eventually end up not learning either of the topic. And there is of course the utility factor, will a literature student ever have to solve partial differential equations? But with that being said we cannot make the same argument for basic mathematics or accounting topics. Let us face it, there will come a time when our literature student in question will have to submit his tax return.
Learning variety of courses will help prepare students for the multi-faceted problems that they will have to face in the real world. If an Engineering student would have a basic understanding of economy he would curtail his design to make a more feasible device. He would be more valued by his employer’s because of consideration of factors seemingly outside his scope. He would also need to have language skills to articulate his plans to intended clients.
Also in this ever changing market we never know when our expertise becomes less sought off. It will not harm then to have some knowledge in a different field which would be more propitious financially. We are also tasked to collaborate constantly on multiple fields, so it would beneficial for all parties if everyone has a basic understanding of what another individual is trying to put forward.
Overall its true that learning a variety of subject can be a hindrance and occasionally futile. However, in our modern world we don’t know what will become useful. So basic understanding of various field should be known to students so that they can better prepare for the challenging world.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 58
- Altruism 3
- Some people believe that success in creative fields, such as painting, fiction writing, andfilmmaking, primarily requires hard work and perseverance. Others believe that suchsuccess mainly requires innate talents that cannot be learned.Write a response in 50
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 58
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: AND_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
..., introducing new rules and systems and than dissembling that very same rule. And un...
^^^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun student seems to be countable; consider using: 'many students'.
Suggestion: many students
...l intended field of study. For example, many student cannot deal with the burden of analysin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ey will have to face in the real world. If an Engineering student would have a bas...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, thus, while, for example, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17312661499 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86377429038 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542635658915 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9755324505 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.1 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206329683045 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666562235681 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673699066331 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109418693272 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532363017074 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.