Some people feel that paparazzi should not follow celebrities and invade their privacy by taking pictures of them everywhere, while others believe this is just the price of fame.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Since the last one decade, media has become increasingly powerful that famous people like actors, politicians and activists do not have private life any more. But some people think that journalists should respect private lives of such people, others believe that fame has certain cost which is inevitable. I think media does its job and celebrities and other famous people enjoy this attention as they consider it a part of their lifestyle.
At one side, some people believe that celebrities are also human like other, they also have families and matters related to them. They should not be followed and captured other than their job places like set or locations where they work. If media does not comprehend the value of privacy, celebrities often end up in hot water because they sometimes do awkward and unhealthy things in their personal lives, such as smoking, drinking alcohol which is usually captured by paparazzi. Instead of chasing them everywhere, media should elaborate their work and assignments to public. Due to constant pressure of paparazzi, famous people often have to portray themselves happy, smiling and ready steady. This can influence general public largely as they become prey to depressive thoughts when they see luxurious way of living of celebrities everywhere on the internet.
On another side, being a celebrity does involve certain difficulties, such as lack of privacy. People think that celebrities are public figure and their matters should not be kept hidden from them. A celebrity gets fame because general public admire him/her. Also, many people get influenced by the actions and deeds of their favorite celebrities, such as hitting gym regularly which celebrities do and media reports about, therefore celebrities should not take paparazzi as offensive rather as a part of their job.
In my opinion, media performs its duties when it captures famous people. This is what media is for, and I also observe that celebrities consider it a source of staying in the eyes of public. They do not mind it at all rather they express joy when they are captured by media. This accelerates their demand in the market. Thus I believe that both media and celebrities earn their livelihood through paparazzi and there is no harm in doing so.
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home withother old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimesthe government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? 73
- Culture is similar all around the world What is the reason Is it a positive trend or negative 95
- You would like a temporary job working in a summer camp which runs sports and outdoor activities for children and young people next summer Write a letter to the organizers of the summer camp In your letter Explain what sort of job you would like to do Des 97
- You are going to take a short holiday in Singapore and you want to rent a holiday apartment while you are there. Write to the tourist information office. In your letter:•explain what you need•say when you plan to be there•ask for information about p 73
- A restaurant has placed an advertisement for waiters and waitresses in your local newspaper.Write a letter to the restaurant, applying for the job. In your letter:•explain what you are currently doing•describe your suitability for this area of work• 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 717, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ng and ready steady. This can influence general public largely as they become prey to depressi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 229, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rom them. A celebrity gets fame because general public admire him/her. Also, many people get i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 321, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...accelerates their demand in the market. Thus I believe that both media and celebriti...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, i think, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 5.05154639175 317% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.03092783505 462% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 32.9175257732 140% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 937.175257732 204% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 372.0 206.0 181% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13440860215 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 3.78020617076 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58237369306 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 127.690721649 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540322580645 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 290.88556701 207% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6804123711 142% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.8652009793 44.8134815571 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 76.5299724578 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 16.8248392259 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 4.34317383033 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22230578488 0.216113520407 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815338111093 0.0766984524023 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045588550671 0.0603063233224 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147788791472 0.12726935374 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236308652113 0.0580467560999 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 8.37731958763 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 70.7449484536 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 8.71597938144 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 41.2886597938 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.