Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
To maintain the respect of the peers, an effective leader must have sound moral judgment, the most important characteristic of him. Morality is everything. Without morality everything is meaningless.
For a leader, exemplar for his peers, sound moral judgment is as basic as human needs heart to live. The basic difference between a just dead person and that person just before some moment while he was thriving is that the heart does not work for him now. Every other parts of his body are similar before and after dead but the heart. Similarly, moral judgment is the heart of an effective leader. The choice of him between right and wrong; honesty and dishonesty means a lot among his peers. Respect comes from the inner body of his peers if they can realize that their leader has a sound moral judgment. A leader having poor moral judgment in no way can earn the respect of his peers. For instance, A dictator who has no morality: leads a life of turpitude, sybarite can still earn the ersatz respect of his peers by browbeating, but in the inner mind the peers execrate him but cannot say anything in front of him. After certain time the peers become disaffected and rebellious and the dictator is overthrown. So, without having a sound moral judgment the efficacy a leader diminishes.
History is rife with character of leaders who are known for their sound moral judgment. Not only they maintained the respect of his peers but even today human reminds them with profound respect. Muhammad of Saudi Arab, lived in between fifth and sixth century after Jesus, is still remembered as a leader having moral judgment not only by the Muslims but also by the historians of other religion. Even the people of his time, who were not his follower, respected him for his moral judgment. Once, all tribes in Arab were involved in an internal dissent on the occasion of placing a sacred stone on the Kabba, a sacred place of Arabs. Years after years passed by but they failed to come into a solution. At last they chose Muhammad, though he was of another religion, to solve the case and he eventually solved it to put an end of the war. They called him “Al-Amin”- The faithful and respected him for his moral judgment.
There may be numerous examples of leaders who received respect from his peers but in all cases those respects were short lived. Hitlar, For instance, earned respect from his peers but for his inhumanity and immoral act against the people of Belgium and Poland he is execrated even today.
Without a sound moral judgment a leader never can be effective.
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 66
- ssdsd 3
- laim: While boredom is often expressed with a sense of self-satisfaction, it should really be a source of embarrassment.Reason: Boredom arises from a lack of imagination and self-motivation. 50
- Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A number of proposals involve 73
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, similarly, so, still, while, for instance, in all cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76169265033 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51890437327 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47438752784 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6990958751 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0833333333 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7083333333 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.21951772744 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407028389683 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140214855279 0.0831039109588 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132357796341 0.0758088955206 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273381792035 0.150359130593 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123945158028 0.0667264976115 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.