Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?
In the modern world, advanced technology has been used by scientists to developed many machines that help in cooking food easily. This has positively impacted society and I strongly believe that it has improved our society.
Undoubtedly, the traditional way of cooking has its benefits. Most important of them all is the taste of food. For instance, the taste of fresh pizza differs from the ready to eat ones. The instant meals are ready to consume just by keeping them in a microwave oven for 2-3 minutes but they have a bland taste. Because one cannot add spices or cheese as per taste. Whereas, the same can be controlled if cooked through the traditional way. Therefore, foods that cooked in the traditional way are tastier than the ready meals.
Nevertheless, the use of technology in preparing food outweigh the advantages of cooking in a traditional way. Firstly, it has eased the process in preparation of food. For example, the use of gas stoves and ovens in cooking food has reduced the time span of preparing a dish as compared to cooking over a wood oven. Additionally, by using these machines one can easily avoid the pain of burning firewood. According to research conducted by nagas in Pakistan, the diseases associated with the eyes have significantly dropped as more people started using gas ovens.
Furthermore, now people have more time to spend with family or doing work. Since, the advent of modern cooking tools like rice cookers, slicers, mixers and so on has not only made cooking easy but fast. As a result, less time is required to prepare food. Such as, during my university days, I used to cook rice in a rice cooker and vegetables in a streamer that gave me more time to work on my project.
In conclusion, the usage of modern tools for cooking has positively affected society as these are not only beneficial for health but also people have more time to spend with family or completing work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | Prabhp | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Prabhp | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Prabhp | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | guojunliang | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | guojunliang | 67 | view |
- Children in some parts of the world have less responsibility compared to children in the past. Some people think this is a positive change, however others think of it as a negative change. What do you think? 73
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays. Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 73
- Scientists predict that all people will choose to talk the same global language in the future.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 73
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past 30 years that many cities in the world are now 'one big traffic jam'. More people should use public transport. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Student should focus on learning in the classroom rather than show their status by wearing fashionable cloths Therefore all students have to wear school uniforms Do you agree or disagree with this statement 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a traditional way" with adverb for "traditional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...food outweigh the advantages of cooking in a traditional way. Firstly, it has eased the process in p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as more people started using gas ovens. Furthermore, now people have more time t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83483483483 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62824703124 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54954954955 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7750870105 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7368421053 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5263157895 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118955541014 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448466017248 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383110152604 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688003669645 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296412519626 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.