The reading passage suggests that three evidential theories about the purpose of the Chaco great house. The lecturer contradicts the reading passage’s claim that all of these theories are unconvincing.
First, the reading argues that the great houses were used to residential places for hundreds of people. However, the lecturer casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that despite their similarities of outside appearances with apartment buildings at Taos, the Chaco structures had not enough places inside for fires to cook for many people. It showed only ten families could make a fire and cook their meals.
Second, The reading contends that the Chaco structures were for containing grain because their size were appropriate for storing food supplies. On the other hand, this counters lecturer’s claim that the excavation of the Chaco structures shows that there were no tracks of maze or remains of maze containers which does not make sense if the Chaco store the tremendous amount of grain maze.
Finally, the reading asserts that the Chaco structures were functioned as ceremonial centers. Near the great houses, there was a mound that seems to be the ceremonial place and excavated broken pots to be used for ceremonies. This refutes the reading passage’s claim that the mound possessed a lot of different materials except pots. It contained building materials and construction tools which lead to the conclusion that pots also might be the regular trash or leftovers for construction workers.
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do. 73
- Tpo 9. Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.I completely disagree with this claim that nowadays children are less creative than they were in the past. Here you can see my reasons. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Cars have made a greater impact on society than airplanes 90
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150-million-year-old mam-mal known as Repenomomus robustus (R. robustus). Interestingly, the mammal's stomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur. Some researchers have therefore suggested 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39166666667 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82546702138 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558333333333 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.050651701 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.636363636 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.