The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table demonstrates millions of hectares of land covered by forest among different parts of the world.
A glance at the table reveals that only Europe and Asia witnessed an increasing pattern, while the rest experiences opposite ones.
As regards the first, the number of forested lands in Europe, was higher over the year, commenced at the highest number among the others at 989 hectares in 1990 and continued to gradually grow to peak at 1001 hectares in 2005. The forested area of Asia went through a mild fluctuation, falling from 576 to just 570 in 2000 and finalized at 584 in 2005.
By contrast, the forested area in the other four countries went down by varying degrees. There was a slight decline of one to three hectares in the statistic of North America and Oceania, with the former initial at 708 and the latter at 199 hectares. The number of both Africa and South America both decreased by 40 hectares to 709 and 904 respectively in 2000, followed by an insignificant dip of approximately 10 hectares in the next five years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-10 | linhht169 | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | Tran Thao Nguyen | 67 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 84
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 78
- The pie chart shows which weight range of the adult population 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.48453608247 27% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 32.9175257732 3% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 937.175257732 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 206.0 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75274725275 4.54256449028 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64365092829 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 127.690721649 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598901098901 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 290.88556701 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 16.3608247423 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.0673863121 44.8134815571 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.571428571 76.5299724578 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 16.8248392259 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 4.34317383033 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131476732648 0.216113520407 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753594654024 0.0766984524023 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100008269118 0.0603063233224 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114681688774 0.12726935374 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118074655057 0.0580467560999 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 8.37731958763 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 70.7449484536 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 8.71597938144 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 7.59969072165 114% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 41.2886597938 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 8.54432989691 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.