Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that many people prefer wealthier nations to support a poorer ones by giving them cash without solving poverty, while nobody can deny that a variety distinction solutions would be better. Personally, I completely agree with the latter point.
There are manifold compelling reasons why financial aid could not diminish the situations. First, since the money is unconditionally given, the ones who received it would lose their driving force to move forward. In fact, they might become depended on the sources that the wealthier countries provided and gradually refused to work in order to pay back their debts. Second, by being continuously meet the others nations needs, the financial status of the lender could face-to-face with risky situations. In addition, the average growth of the global economy might slow down.
Apart from the practical drawbacks expressed above, I believed that with suitable solutions, government could potentially solve most of the problems. One kinds of help is that provide educational support for the underprivileged country. Therefore, a higher-education workforce takes an imperative part in developing the wealth of a nation. furthermore, advances in technologies could be transferred between country in order for the poorer to have the chances to approach leading edge technologies, so that labour-saving appliances would be used to increase their revenue. For example, scientists from poorer countries are usually sent abroad to study and then returned to applied what they have learned in relate to the essential fields to their countries.
In conclusion, it seems to me that another types of help is more factual than just simply provide a developing country with a decent amount of money without navigating them how to use it efficiently.
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 84
- Global Warming 56
- The pie chart shows which weight range of the adult population 90
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 151, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'One kind', 'a kind', or simply 'kinds'?
Suggestion: One kind; A kind; Kinds
...potentially solve most of the problems. One kinds of help is that provide educational sup...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 341, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...t in developing the wealth of a nation. furthermore, advances in technologies could be tran...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, so, then, therefore, while, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43928571429 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9770701081 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646428571429 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2113125847 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.153846154 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206351648688 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573950459478 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412285761223 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11549478262 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282706926454 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.