The two pie charts below show the percentage of industry sectors’s contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.
The pie charts illustrate the information about the proportion of contribution to the economy of Turkey by 8 various sectors during 2000 and 2016.
In overall, agriculture , healthcare and education constituted a major industrial fields which give for economy because construction, finance business and other contributing least percentage.
It can be seen from the information that contribution to the economy by agriculture sector accounted nearly a quarter in 2000; whilst, it declined at 14% during 2016 in particular nation. In addition to this, construction contributed for economy had experienced a rise of more than three -fold of the total percentage between 2000 and 2016 in Turkey. Interestingly, contribution by healthcare and education remained relatively consistent at 17% in both years. Apart from that, there were a 4% of an increase can be observed in contribution of manufacturing field.
The charts further prove that proportion of trade,utilities and transportation had experienced a two percent growth from 2000 to 2016 in specific region. Moreover, a fall of 3% can be noticed in contribution to economy by leisure, hospitality and government sector in Turkey. Lastly, finance business and other contribution to the economy of Turkey we’re found 8% and 5% respectively during 2016 and 2000.
- The first chart shows the population of England and Wales between 1700 and 2000 The second chart gives information about the birth and death rates in the same countries and same periods Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 47
- More and more people are spending a large amount of money to make their appearance look younger? Why do people want to look younger? Do you think it will be bring positive or negative development? 73
- Tourism is encouraged in many countries. Does tourism bring more advantages or disadvantages to a country? 89
- Compare the types of communication used in 1962 and in1982.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...contribution to the economy of Turkey by 8 various sectors during 2000 and 2016. ...
^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...2000 and 2016. In overall, agriculture , healthcare and education constituted a ...
^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'field'?
Suggestion: field
...ducation constituted a major industrial fields which give for economy because construc...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'contributing the least'.
Suggestion: contributing the least
...onstruction, finance business and other contributing least percentage. It can be seen from the i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 50, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , utilities
...s further prove that proportion of trade,utilities and transportation had experienced a tw...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, moreover, apart from, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 3.97073170732 479% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54455445545 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3941422919 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569306930693 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9386203365 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.444444444 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432373605431 0.215688989381 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177508039356 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10891666722 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274057841674 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117679572542 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.4329268293 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.