An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition
it is good to know about the doctor before hand before getting the treatment. The recommendation says that an ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. I partially agree with this recommendation as this have more adverse affects than positive outcomes.
First, not everyone is enough educated in the feild of medicine to estimate the doctor's efficiency by merely looking into the record of trating similarly afflicted patients. it should be noted that every patient is different, every disease is different in terms of severity. doctors often treat every person in a unique manner based on the intensity and type of the disease or ailment. For example, by giving access to the previous records, one might get worried if the disease is not treated in the similar fashion, though the disease is similar. this might have adverse affects on the patients, as the patients do not completely believe in the the doctor's efficacy.
Second, by having access to the earlier records, the patients' mental state will be disturbed. To illustrate, the patient's the condition might be less severe than the earlier patients'. So, by having access to the earlier records, the patient might think that the doctor does unnecessary treatment for minute ailments for the sake of money. it is better to have the reviews and ratings on the doctors by the treated patients, instead of having complete access to the records.
Finally, there are some positive side of this recommendation. By just having access the success rate of the doctor can be estimated. this has high chances of having placebo effect on the patients, in case of a successful doctor. Since, the patient think the doctor can cure any ailment that he treats. Also having the records open, the under performing doctors can be put in check and can limit them from treating cases with more intensity.
In conclusion, it is good to have some presumption about the doctor before availing the treatment from him for the ailments. The given recomendation should be moderated. having complete access of the previous records is not a good recommendation, instead as said above, having the ratings and reviews of the earlier treated patients should be access. Hence, I partially agree with the author's recommendation. it can be implemented with some temperation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Harshali_15 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Masterji | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | sarahaduwa | 66 | view |
- Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action.Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of the action are more important than the i 50
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition 54
- “In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town, we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area. The Hillview landfill, which has been undeveloped from decades, is a perfect site for this plant. 69
- some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society, especially among children. others believe that children's peer groups and parent as their role models are a much more powerful influence on 54
- Many teachers assign homework to students every day. Do you think that daily homework is necessary for students? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is good to know about the doctor before...
^^
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: BEFORE_HAND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beforehand'?
Suggestion: beforehand
it is good to know about the doctor before hand before getting the treatment. The recom...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...n the feild of medicine to estimate the doctors efficiency by merely looking into the r...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...f trating similarly afflicted patients. it should be noted that every patient is d...
^^
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Doctors
...ease is different in terms of severity. doctors often treat every person in a unique ma...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a unique manner" with adverb for "unique"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...erity. doctors often treat every person in a unique manner based on the intensity and type of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 549, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...fashion, though the disease is similar. this might have adverse affects on the patie...
^^^^
Line 7, column 643, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...e patients do not completely believe in the the doctors efficacy. Second, by ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 643, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...e patients do not completely believe in the the doctors efficacy. Second, by ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 651, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...ts do not completely believe in the the doctors efficacy. Second, by having acc...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 340, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... minute ailments for the sake of money. it is better to have the reviews and ratin...
^^
Line 19, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ss rate of the doctor can be estimated. this has high chances of having placebo effe...
^^^^
Line 19, column 230, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tients, in case of a successful doctor. Since, the patient think the doctor can cure ...
^^^^^
Line 19, column 303, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...or can cure any ailment that he treats. Also having the records open, the under perf...
^^^^
Line 25, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Having
...iven recomendation should be moderated. having complete access of the previous records...
^^^^^^
Line 25, column 344, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accessed'?
Suggestion: accessed
... the earlier treated patients should be access. Hence, I partially agree with the auth...
^^^^^^
Line 25, column 386, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...cess. Hence, I partially agree with the authors recommendation. it can be implemented w...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 410, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... agree with the authors recommendation. it can be implemented with some temperatio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, if, look, second, similarly, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15424164524 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72214534337 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460154241645 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 615.6 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.825341822 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1363636364 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6818181818 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 18.0 7.80617977528 231% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405298775436 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127731510858 0.0831039109588 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132482090146 0.0758088955206 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251265679533 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664037213967 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.