Some people claim that you can tell whether a nation is great by looking at the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists. Others argue that the surest indicator of a great nation is, in fact, the general welfare of its entire people.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
In the course of history, it is debatable that the greatness of a nation is due to the general welfare of its people. Although it is conceded that the general welfare plays a significant role in shaping a great nation in few cases, one cannot deny the fact that the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists are the surest indicator of a great nation.
Granted, when considering the myriads of European countries, general welfare surely is a crucial factor in forming a great nation. Take the example of Sweden. For decades, Sweden government went the extra mile to ameliorate their general welfare, thus making their relative and absolute poverty rate to the lowest. By providing, maternity respite, well-programmed nursing care, old-age pensions, and other various welfare policies, Sweden enabled its citizens to have equal access to education and subsidized health care. Therefore, Sweden is clearly reputed as a great nation among many other countries.
However, even though the general welfare rendered a nation to sustain its greatness, the surest indicator of a great nation is illustrated by the successes of its rulers. To illustrate, one exemplary can be found in the story of Abraham Lincoln. As the 16th president of the United States, Lincoln implemented Emancipation Proclamation. Because of his achievement in abolishing slavery, a plethora of people was able to find their freedom and enhanced the societal human right.
Moreover, another similar example can be found in the field of science. successful inventions of scientists lead a nation to build its greatness. For instance, Thomas Edison, who developed a long-lasting light bulb, enabled countless people to afford the light bulb at a reasonable price. Clearly, because Edison contrived such a light bulb that both efficient to use and reasonable, people of his country were able to enhance their quality of life, contributing a lot to shape a great nation.
In brief, the general welfare can be an essential factor when developing a great nation. Nevertheless, as the examples shown aforementioned above prove, the surest indicator of a great nation is the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.
- "Your recent article on corporate downsizing in Elthyria maintains that the majority of competent workers who have lost jobs as a result of downsizing face serious economic hardship, often for years, before finding other suitable employment. But this clai 83
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company."Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One 89
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed Reading Course has greatly improved productivity One g 66
- Some people claim that you can tell whether a nation is great by looking at the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists. Others argue that the surest indicator of a great nation is, in fact, the general welfare of its entire people.Write a resp 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 73, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Successful
...e can be found in the field of science. successful inventions of scientists lead a nation ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32285714286 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94345208965 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0740365754 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.588235294 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440373337921 0.243740707755 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139938869233 0.0831039109588 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132403912348 0.0758088955206 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277111690086 0.150359130593 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12665613669 0.0667264976115 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.