Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any diseases? Pros and cons?
The importance of video communication with doctor which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. This essay will further elaborate both aspects of this trend and this will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which will further explain but the most preponderant stems from the fact that video communication with doctor is beneficial of any patients who suffering from hazardous diseases like cancer, malaria, heart attack as well as doctors can tell us any treatment for hazardous diseases by video communication furthermore we can do video communication in worldwide experienced doctors. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that by video communication doctors send us good medicines for diseases. Needless to say all these merits stand video communication stand in a good stead.
However there are some pitfalls that negate this argument but which can certainly overwhelm but the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that sometime doctors cannot understand disease symptoms of diseases they can treat wrong to them as well as doctors misguided to them furthermore doctors give wrong medicines, Besides some time network not get in mobile therefore, video communication is sometime get wrong. Hence it is apparent why many are against video communication with doctors.
According to the arguments aforementioned above one can reach a conclusion that the pros of video communication with doctor are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless its potential cons should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-13 | Jaskaransingh11 | 79 | view |
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? pros and cons 79
- It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics.Use specific reasons and example to support your opinion? 80
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small shop. Do you agree and disagree? 70
- Experience is more effective way to teach , compared to books? Agree or disagree. 75
- Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... communication stand in a good stead. However there are some pitfalls that negate thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...eo communication is sometime get wrong. Hence it is apparent why many are against vid...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...on with doctor are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless its potential cons should not be overlo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46274509804 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98620176807 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 135.881302596 50.4703680194 269% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.777777778 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 20.9669160288 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2222222222 7.25397266985 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357455166261 0.242375264174 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144706050366 0.0925447433944 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897719448484 0.071462118173 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211032016701 0.151781067708 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758993232349 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 53.1260098522 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.94827586207 201% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 71.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.