Experience is more effective way to teach compared books? agree or disagree.
The importance of experience is more effective way compared to books which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. This essay will further elaborate both aspect of this trend and this will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that experience teaching is beneficial compared to books as well as experience teaching is useful and helpful in any situation. Another pivotal aspect for the fact is some people think books are fully waste of time and energy that's why people don’t give preference to books. For instance, experience is better compare to books with the help of experience we can easily survive in any dilemma. Needless to say all these merits stand of experience is more effective compared to books in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate this argument and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but the most alarming is that books are beneficial for next generation as well as books increase student mind level and also provides knowledge of history. As an illustration, books are become main part of our society without books no one can gain knowledge of history as well as many adolescents are fond of books therefore books are beneficial to all pupils. It is apparent why many are against to experience is more effective way compared to books.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that the benefit of experience is more effective way compared to books are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless the potential drawbacks should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-10 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-08-15 | Rafia Jawad | 88 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
- The medical technology is responsible for increasing the average life expectancy. Do you think it is a curse or a blessings? 70
- U2U2 PUOEWRIOQ PWUOEWQU9R 98EWQUE2UE PSDU WIOUE9Q8E02828823 JWQOIUE203 IUWOQEQ7E7823 HDWQEWQUUEWEUWQUE JDSADOWI 55
- Foreign language should be made compulsory in the primary school.Agree or disagree 72
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children's acts. What is your opinion? support it with personal examples. 55
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? pros and cons 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ooks are fully waste of time and energy thats why people don't give preference t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of history as well as many adolescents are fond of books therefore books are be...
^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of books therefore books are beneficial to all pupils. It is apparent why many a...
^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...pared to books are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless the potential drawbacks should not be o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.5418719212 209% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13194444444 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77867173115 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503472222222 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.7069524123 50.4703680194 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.363636364 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.25397266985 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401494181941 0.242375264174 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177209118061 0.0925447433944 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13187718972 0.071462118173 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263416204274 0.151781067708 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483528122595 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.