In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could .Why do you think this is ? What can be done to change this ?
Recycling has been known as one of the most famous method to improve the environment. Most countries don’t reuse their wastes as much as possible. It’s well known, for any problem to exist there must be causes and there should be solutions.
In my opinion, a prodigious amount of countries wouldn’t really want to spend money on recycling, because it’s really expensive. Presidents think that they ought to pay money on more important problems present in their country. For example, the Indonesian President wouldn’t care that much about solving pollution than building shelters for the poor. On the other hand, the more thrived countries will not carry the burden of converting on their own, so that in the future it would cause problems.
Therefore, to solve this crisis the Modern United Nations might want to interfere by collecting money. The expensive cost of reprocessing could be divided among all countries, but not equally. As a result, developed countries should pay higher percentages than the less advanced countries, because the poor countries have other priorities and they can’t afford the expensive process. In addition, there is another way to deal with the dilemma, which is that for shops operating in the country should reuse. For example, Adidas converts the plastic bottles to trendy, clean, and new shoes. With this mind, Adidas is decreasing the money wasted on the materials itself, and makes more profit.
To sum up, the majority of countries don’t want the responsibility of improving the environment. We should lift some weight off of their shoulders by dividing the price of the process between the countries.
- The best time for children to learn a second language in primary school than secondary school that what some scientists pinpoint about?. In this essay will discuss advantages and disadvantages for learn foreign language in primary school. 56
- In education and employment, some people work harder than others. Why do some people work harder? Is it always a good thing to work hard? 61
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your community.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this on your community . Do you oppose or support the factory .Explain your position. 61
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the U.S between 1988 and 2000. 73
- In general, people do not have such a close relationship with their neighbors as they did in the past . Why is this so , and what can be done to improve contact between neighbors? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recycling has been known as one of the m...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...causes and there should be solutions. In my opinion, a prodigious amount of co...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the future it would cause problems. Therefore, to solve this crisis the Mode...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erials itself, and makes more profit. To sum up, the majority of countries don...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29588014981 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76254234809 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614232209738 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7481526094 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131285090912 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445063504641 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342809849152 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764892408341 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268582303419 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.