A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
In a world were no two persons are the exact carbon copy of each other (even if they are identical twins, there is always one small thing that differentiates them), why should everyone be forced to push through the same national curriculum ubtil college. I strongly believe that every student is unique and this uniquness is something to be nourished and pampered. Thus students must undergo customised educational tracks tailored to fit their unique needs.
Let us consider the following anectode. On a beautiful summer day, somewhere deep inside the forest, all the animals were gathered and told hat they will be put through a series of tests and the one to win the most of them will be named the next king. The animal group included fishes, monkeys, elephants, cheetahs, etc and they were put through a series of swimming, climbing, running and strength tests. As we expect, the fish won swimming, but stood no chance in anything else, the fastest of them all, the Cheetah effortlessly won the running race but lost to monkey in climbing and similarly every animal which won something lost in something else. Ultimately at the end of the day there was no single winner. Why? Beacause every animal had its uniqueness, their specific skill set were they cannot be beat. And now replace animals with humans, that is exactly our story. Every student is unique and has a specific skill set and talent in which he reigns unbeatable. The education system to be fair and helpful, must design a curriculm tailored to meet these unique needs of each and every student.
As we know, there is no use training a fish to climb a tree for years even with the best tutors, because it was not designed to do so. And so are students, If a student is a born athelete with immense passion for the same, but is a little slow-witted in science, there is no use putting the student this student through gruelling science regime just because the unified national curriculum includes it. No matter how hard the education systems tries shove chemistry or physics down his throat, his heart will always lie in athletics. He might never make a nobel wtinning scientists but with a little push the student will definitely become a world renowned athlete. Thus the curriculum must be designed to fit the special needs of every student, because every student with their uniqueness is special.
But the above argument assumes that, the students have already firgured out their niche are, their specific skill set. Only in those cases, it is possible to build and design a curriculum to nurture their skills. If a students has not yet figured out what exactly is his innate skill and where exactly his heart lies, these types of children need to be exposed to a type of education where, they are introduced to an eclectic array of skills and fields. This might ultimately help the students to try various things and find their niche, once found they can shift to a curriculum built just to cater to this specific need.
A single common national curriculum tends to overlook these differences, thereby it is being unfair to the students. The only solution to this: “Every students needs to be put through a customized curriculum which is tailored to meet their specific needs”. This way we will embrace the student’s uniqueness and bolster it’s growth. Unique is not weird it is beautiful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | ali.rs | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | ali.rs | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Shams Tarek | 62 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | ali.rs | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 364, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...something to be nourished and pampered. Thus students must undergo customised educat...
^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nkeys, elephants, cheetahs, etc and they were put through a series of swimming, c...
^^
Line 9, column 668, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nitely become a world renowned athlete. Thus the curriculum must be designed to fit ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 217, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
... curriculum to nurture their skills. If a students has not yet figured out what exactly is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... skill and where exactly his heart lies, these types of children need to be expos...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, similarly, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 19.5258426966 189% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2819.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 579.0 442.535393258 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86873920553 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90534594407 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53838539615 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514680483592 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 874.8 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2605197614 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.76 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.16 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36 5.21951772744 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121374651487 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348752968943 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340563639112 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773984121115 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202179761315 0.0667264976115 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.