With the advancement in language translation technology, the use of language translating applications has increased among people. There are various advantages of such progress namely: easily accessible and spread of business around the globe.The disadvantages are a threat to employment of professional language translators and the accuracy errors. I believe that the merits far outweigh the drawbacks.
To begin with, online language translator apps are available to everyone throughout the world and that too without cost. As a result of which many people use it for multiple purposes. It is an economical way of learning a new language without paying a single penny. Since most of the students plan to pursue their career abroad, they can use it to learn the language which is being spoken in their desired place. Consequently, they can master an entirely new language by just using an app. Moreever, it would help them to socialize besides studying.
In addition to this, it has oppened gates for the businessmen to spread their business in other countries. Since businessperson needs to interact with their fellows in other places, it enables them to communicate effectively. Thus, it can let one to expand the work in the whole world. For instance, a person who cannot speak English can do a business with englishman by using these apps as mean of communication.
Although these apps are extremely beneficial, they do carry accuracy risk. The translation cannot be upto the mark sometimes and convey the real message as a human translator would have done. For instance, an article was published in a famous newspaper depicting how students couldnot perform well in a given assignment of writing an essay in a foreign language which they learned in the school. Because they used the app for translation, they couldnot give proper meaning and lesson in the essay.
Furthermore, it also has a huge impact in the lives of professioal translators. As these apps are free, they would discourage people to hire professionals to meet their needs. As a result of which, they would not be employed. Hence it would be difficult for them to survive.
In conclusion, although language translator apps are widely available and have enabled one to expand business globally, they pose a threat to the survival of trainned personnels and the margins of error are high.
- Schools should teach their students how to survive financially in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 73
- The cultures of many countries around the world becomes more similar than they used to be.What are the reasons for this trend?Is it positive or negative? 56
- School teaching should focus on the success of the workforce and less importance should be given to academic acheivement To what extent do you agree 60
- The bar chart shows the participation of children in selected leisure activities in Australia 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...and spread of business around the globe.The disadvantages are a threat to employmen...
^^^
Line 9, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...t of which, they would not be employed. Hence it would be difficult for them to survi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14766839378 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9058870779 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538860103627 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.1810153098 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3181818182 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22727272727 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212354815416 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603303738915 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525036365969 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109081247357 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532259791057 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.