TPO 7 integrated: receiving the eco-certification in wood companies of United States
The main idea of both the passage and the talk is about whether encouraging wood companies in America to produce eco-certified products or not. These action provide numerous disadvantages for them. The lecturer challenges all the viable defects that mentioned in the reading. He is of the opinion that none of these reasons is not reasonable.
Firstly, the reading sates that American consumers do not trust to the advertising that companies provide for their products. Therefore, they do not understand and distinguish among certified and not certified products. The lecturer, on the other hand, believes that a plethora of American consumers have been seeking for eco-certified products. Furthermore, he mentions that although they pay attention to the type of companies, they trust to companies that are not independent and American agency support them.
In addition, the reading brings the idea that the products price are very critical for consumers, and they strive to buy uncertified products because these stuffs are very cheaper than other. The speaker, conversely, sates that although price is very significant factor for choosing products, there are many other factors that people consider when they want to buy products. Furthermore, he believes that because the eco-certified products’ price are not very much than uncertified one, so people contemplate other factors rather than price.
Eventually, the author of the reading mentions that American companies would not make a relationship with other companies that are abroad. On the other hand, the speaker holds the view that if American companies provide eco-certified products and there products export to other countries, the well-known international companies will be motivated to have businesses with these companies. Thus, these companies would enhance their profits and reputation all over the world.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-25 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 70 | view |
2023-11-25 | Apolytos | 80 | view |
2023-09-25 | MA KUNG TING | 80 | view |
2023-09-03 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
2023-08-31 | madinaaaaaaaaaa | 80 | view |
- Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 73
- TPO 8 - Integrated memoir that was written by Chevalier de Seingalt 80
- Extra 2- Integrated writing 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this action' or 'These actions'?
Suggestion: This action; These actions
... produce eco-certified products or not. These action provide numerous disadvantages for them...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of these reasons is not reasonable. Firstly, the reading sates that American...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt and American agency support them. In addition, the reading brings the idea...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...late other factors rather than price. Eventually, the author of the reading me...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5979020979 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92242648433 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48951048951 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1661335354 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.357142857 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103571780697 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402309946435 0.0996497079465 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442945742326 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725119681138 0.162205337803 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404306638201 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.