Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Submitted by hiradkh14 on Sat, 09/14/2019 - 13:47

Job is a dispensable part of human life, which they are mainly relied on for attaining social respect and fulfilling the financial needs. So, it is undeniably important for every person to be successful in his future life. The controversial question that remains is whether it is more important to have an ability to relate well to people or to just study hard in school. Considering the benefits of each, it isn't an easy topic to decide. I believe that it mainly depends on the job we are considering. There are some points that should be analyzed according to the job, some of which are elaborated here.

There are some particular jobs that are mainly focused on studying different matters, researching for information and ideas, and pondering activities. For example, consider an engineer who works in the new product design section of a car factory. Such employees usually work in a room with a computer, and their job mainly focuses on studying the concepts of designing and some mathematical calculations of course. There isn't much need for communication in these cases, and good academic background can assure your success. However, even in these occupations there are some cases that you need to share your ideas with other people, which an ability to relate well can help.

Alongside the type of occupation we discussed above, there are some other jobs that are in direct and inevitable connection with people. For instance, consider a lawyer whose job is mainly based on making arguments and the ability to communicate with people. Another example is a businessman whose job is persuading people to buy commodities. People would not be persuaded if you are not able to relate well. The ability plays a critical rule in these occupations, making the importance of the academic education fade away. However, having some relevant knowledge still remains as a prerequisite.

According what we elaborated, it is not possible to overlook any of the two, which are both main ingredients of success in a job. People need some sufficient knowledge about the subject they are going to work on which needs hard study. They also need some ability to relate so that they be able to communicate with people and also to share their ideas with others. It is recommended that people try to develop their abilities in a diverse variety of dimensions, and do not restrict themselves to studying hard.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 DHANDA 90 view
2020-01-13 naziii 76 view
2020-01-06 sarah halawani 65 view
2020-01-06 liviapabreu 66 view
2020-01-05 Somayya 76 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by user hiradkh14 :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 410, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...l. Considering the benefits of each, it isnt an easy topic to decide. I believe that...
^^^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...hematical calculations of course. There isnt much need for communication in these ca...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, still, well, for example, for instance, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96517412935 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7750147145 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509950248756 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.26066258 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0476190476 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286285637391 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853158214835 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624811063402 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181643699535 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189842299194 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.