The charts below show the proportions of british students at one one university in england who were able to speak other languages in addition to english, in 2000 and 2010. summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts compare the number of British students who were at one university could speak foreign languages apart from English from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that the percentage of speaking only Spanish had the highest number compared to the other data both two years. Moreover, there was no change in the number of speaking only german over ten years.
According to the charts, regarding speaking only Spanish was 30% in 2010 and rose gradually in a decade, being higher than other languages. Also, students knew another language that increased slightly by 5% in 2010 with 15% to 10% respectively. Similarly, there was a growth of 5% in speaking two other languages in ten years.
On the other hand, the proportion of speaking only French decreased marginally a one-tenth (20% to 10% consecutively) over ten years. Meanwhile, pupils did not know another language which declined by 5% from 15% to 10% while speaking german only had the same figure with 10% between 2000 and 2010.
- The first chat below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 59
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r language that increased slightly by 5% in 2010 with 15% to 10% respectively. Si...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, while, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05917159763 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54645573679 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573964497041 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1824413421 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.875 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241107134575 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112851248888 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985975040198 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170000357558 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116494005525 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.