Not enough people realize the importance of natural world. What are the reasons of people’s lack of awareness? How can people be made more aware?
Many people are unaware that how indispensable it is to protect natural living conditions of the world, and, strangely, this is the fault of our education system which is not performing its responsibility of educating people about environmental protection. In fact, media, other than educational institutions, can play a significant role in bringing awareness to public.
As long as education system does not realize the need to study natural world, it would be impossible for people to know and value it. Since children, from grade one, learn more about science and mathematics, they, as a result of limited exposure, hardly develop their interest in knowing about the universe. Similarly, 90 percent universities are offering degrees relevant to science, art and law while very few are considering environment and nature based courses useful. For this reason, people, unintentionally, are less inclined towards recognizing worth of natural world, but interested only in enjoying its beauty.
Whereas, media and educational institutions can create a difference. Undoubtedly, media has a gigantic power to persuade people’ mind from one field of study towards another. By presenting fascinating natural features of the world, their benefits and consequences if destroyed, people can become more aware than ever before. Education, likewise, is crucial for elaborating substantial value of natural resources though. Subjects, for instance, can be introduced all educational levels—from primary to secondary. In addition, people should be provided with the opportunity to be more active in environment related activities since this is an area of work limited to concerned departments only. So, involvement of general public needs to be encouraged by arranging awareness workshops and voluntary training sessions regarding nature preservation.
Unlike the past, education system should revise its courses by including more environment exploring subjects, which would allow people to have insight of the universe. This cannot be possible to achieve unless both media and education system comprehend this necessity.
- Some people think libraries are a waste of resources and money so computers should replace them. However, others do not agree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- You took a two day course. Write a feedback to course organizer.In your letter, you should tell:•what details of the course are,•what you like•what you want to them to do to make it better. 89
- Every country should have a free health service, even if this means that the latest medical treatments may not be available through the service because they are too expensive.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include 73
- A friend has agreed to look after your house and pet while you are on holiday. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter • give contact details for when you are away • give instructions about how to care for your pet • describe other household d 89
- ou eat at your college cafeteria at lunch time every day.. However, you think it needs some improvements. Write a letter to the college magazine. In your letter:explain what you like about the cafeteriasay what is wrong with itsuggest how it could be impr 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 718, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ed departments only. So, involvement of general public needs to be encouraged by arranging awa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, regarding, second, similarly, so, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79936305732 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12251361592 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624203821656 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1005789566 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.4 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320874802704 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100464729932 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743459861725 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189494710757 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079220033649 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.