Transnational marriage has brought more benefits than drawbacks. Do you agree or disagree?
People used to be limited in the choice for lifelong partners but currently transnational marriage has become ubiquitous around the world, which triggers some deprecating comments against this brand new form of marriage. From my perspective, the criticism is unfounded and both the couple and their children can benefit a lot from it.
Admittedly, some opponents may defend their ideas by proposing the problems during the marriage for the sake of the potential cultural shock. However, a man and a woman can hardly get married without understanding and love to each other and these two essential factors, as the precondition for a marriage, are the best tools to minimize the possible conflicts that may be encountered by the husbands and wives from distinctive cultural backgrounds. That is to say, the couple have already foreseen the misunderstanding or controversies in their marriage and think it acceptable from the very beginning , or otherwise there is little likelihood for them to enter the church and promised to love and care each other before God.
Additionally, the whole family, not only the couples, but also the children, may thus have more possibilities for their future life. On account of the present acts for citizenship in most countries, either part in an international marriage has the freedom to become the citizen in his or her partner’s country or at least is able to obtain Permanent Residence in this country. Therefore, resources including job opportunities, medical care or other social welfare become easily available. Besides, children are naturally born in a bi-cultural background, which helps to cultivate their language abilities and enable them to think in a more flexible manner.
In conclusion, transnational marriage should not be regarded as a cursed one which bring sorrow and harm. Instead, as long as this couple is married in the name of love, the whole family will be more benefited rather than suffer from the marriage.
- Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Transnational marriage has brought more benefits than drawbacks. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Transnational marriage has brought more benefits than drawbacks. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- Modern agriculture methods damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 76
- Some people believe that the range of technologies available to individuals will increase the gap between the rich and the poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 459, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... to live without accompany of children. For the other parents, it may be difficult ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, after all, for instance, in general, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49544072948 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09755823347 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58358662614 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5753807499 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.45 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0736737826394 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0236800441172 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342741782622 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0501574503354 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268668388784 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.