Work efficiency has been a burning global issue. Some specialists suggest that when engaged in many different works, workers are highly likely to be effective in very few things. Personally, I disagree with this suggestion.
On one hand, what I put in my priority is a high efficiency of working. The fact is that when striving to complete many different works, workers are highly likely to broaden their knowledge in a wide variety of areas in life. As a result, when encountering a new work, this knowledge background creates chances for them to determine the problem with many perspectives. Correspondingly, the rate that they are able to find an effective method to get it done is ameliorated. Therefore, it is bound to augment their work proficiency. More importantly, changing the work overtime stops them from falling into boredom, because doing only one thing for a long time is supposed to fatigue people. Accordingly, due to this interest, they incline to put concentrate on the work. For this reason, it stands a golden chance for the work efficiency to leap a huge distance. Beyond any doubt, solving different works is a precious opportunity for workers to enhance their success in their work.
On the other hand, it is claimed that lots of work are accompanied by a large amount of energy required. Consequently, workers are certain to be pushed into stressful feelings. However, it is just applicable to a minority. In fact, workers always schedule a suitable process. Hence, the flow of doing the work is able to happen without obstruction. In addition, when taking place in broad variety of disciplines, it is possible for people to meet many others. In that case, their relationship in both social area and work obviously reach the peak of extension. Subsequently, it is the essence of the fact that they are bound to receive lots of help from their relationship. Successively, the ability of success in their careers is apt to be strengthened. Thus, there is a likelihood that it brings them lots of relaxing moments. By and large, the claim that many works cause workers to get into the darkest life is unrealistic.
In summary, all the factors mentioned above is evidence supporting my writing. It is strongly advised that specialists should take my writing into great consideration to guideline an appropriate policy on work efficiency.
- TPO 48 - Integrated Writing Task 75
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 66
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...pecialists suggest that when engaged in many different works, workers are highly likely to be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... fact is that when striving to complete many different works, workers are highly likely to bro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, in addition, in fact, in summary, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03053435115 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9697327361 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539440203562 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.258117806 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.08 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.72 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115463708267 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296396175148 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366309317311 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0736804002252 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421461770548 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.