In towns and cities
Shopping and purchasing style of the people has changed in the last few decades. Shopping centres substitutes the local markets in the urban area. I believe that the shopping centres and local markets have their own benefits and drawbacks. This essay deals with the impacts of shopping centers and local markets in people's life along with my opinion.
First of all, shopping malls became center of attraction to people. Now people buy and buy things from shopping malls to show their living standards. Secondly, people can buy everything of the best quality from shopping mall. However, because of the best quality of products shopping is expensive in these shopping centers. It's hard to buy expensive products for middle or lower class people. Finally, in shopping malls gaming clubs and fun zones attract the people of all ages. For example:- DLF MALL has an India the biggest gaming park.
On the other hand, Small shops in nearby markets fulfill the daily need of people's, because people cannot go to shopping malls every time for little things. Moreover, these local shops offer a variety of products from low quality to high quality. Apart from that, few local shops gives a home delivery service of products. Furthermore, these local shops save time and energy of people. Because People buy things while returning from office or work.
To put it in nutshell I pen down saying that attraction of shopping malls cannot affect the local small shops.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-30 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2021-11-30 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2021-11-28 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 72 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | heemagupta | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | Sarwan1996 | 62 | view |
- Demand of food is increasing 56
- The pie charts show percentage of working adults spent time on different activities. 78
- Many companies sponser sports as way of advertisement. 73
- Demand of food 67
- The two pie charts below compare the percentagewise contribution in Turkish economy by various sector's in 2000 and 2016 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, while, apart from, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.5418719212 9% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04526748971 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27962739168 2.71678728327 84% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547325102881 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.5520479351 50.4703680194 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.1176470588 104.977214359 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2941176471 20.9669160288 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.242375264174 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0925447433944 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.071462118173 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151781067708 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 12.6369458128 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.1260098522 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.9458128079 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.94827586207 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.