1. True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author of issue contends that aims set by oneself are the indicator of his or her triumph. This is a claim with which I generally do not concur; indeed, two terms of goal and success are two different and irrelevant factors. While the aim is set in the initial base of any action, the succuss is the last phase which represents the outcome of the action and relies on various elements. In what follows, I will lists factors which are effective at the achievement of success and are separate from the set goal.
This first factor which ends to the success is the technics and tools which are implemented during the occupation. Meanwhile, different methods and equipment can end to the desired result titled as a triumph; some others, on the other hand, can lead to the failure. In this scenario, even with the settlement of the striking and success-warranted aim, if the used method and tools were not selected appropriately, there will be no chance for success. A lucid instance which shed the spotlight on the issue is my experience. At the university, I had to present a lecture about a project which was about my field of research, and I worked on for two-semester. I had the chasm and comprehensive understanding of the topic, and my advisor and I were sure that the presentation would be flawless. However, for the sake of my wrong selected technic for presentation, I could not convey the data completely. While I could use a graphical figure to depict the topic is a few slides, I used the written forms in many slides which were boring for the audiences. Although I was fully prepared for that presentation and I could do in the best way; the wrong method of presentation affected my success in the presentation.
Another equally notable factor is the eagerness of the person. No matter how fancy goal is set by a person, as long as he does not have the enthusiasm for his action, the specification of those goals are useless and dead-ended action. This fact is also verified by an intelligible refreshingly psychology study conducted in my country. According to this noteworthy study, with an average level of intelligence and with the same set of methods and types of equipment for specific goals between two individuals, the possibility of achieving the success by the one who has more eagerness than the other is approximately fifty percent higher. This survey obviously shows that even with the right selection of methods and tools, the enthusiasm for reaching the triumph is crucial.
On the other hand, some people may believe that people set a goal according to their achievement; in other words, if a person fulfills his settled aim, he would go a step further and set a goal bigger than the previous ones. Even though this belief seems logic and sound in the first glance, it actually underestimates a subtle point that human being is free for dreaming. Even with failures in the initial steps and attempts, he has this liberties to set far-fetched goals for himself. As an example, if a student fails in the entry exam of the university, he has this freedom to dream a score higher for his next year, while he does not have this capacity. Therefore, not all aims are based on reality and represent the true situation.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned arguments explicitly illustrate that the aim set in the first steps of attempt does not indicate the success. Success relies on various factors such and method, tools, and eagerness of doer which totally differs from the aim.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-17 | anon7652 | 50 | view |
| 2022-01-02 | Srushti Shinde | 50 | view |
| 2021-10-20 | bislam | 62 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | prodigyanushka | 54 | view |
| 2021-07-22 | me2mahesh | 58 | view |
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species' extinctions, because t 35
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 40
- 1.Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.Write a respons 66
- 1.Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, b 70
- tpo23 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 415, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'list'
Suggestion: list
...rious elements. In what follows, I will lists factors which are effective at the achi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 435, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... the initial steps and attempts, he has this liberties to set far-fetched goals for ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2905.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 609.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77011494253 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96768813016 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8062978661 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47947454844 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 899.1 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9480704421 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.2 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.36 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225222078608 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663058138915 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357674717943 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127861522216 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359671367862 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.