Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As some people may hold a view that today's technology ruins the children's creativity; however, others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that this technology leads to more creative generation. I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first exquisite reason which advocates my outlook is the deep vision of children gained by the advancement of technology. It is lucidly obvious that the existence of technology such as the television, the internet, and the computer enhance the people's intellectual status. The kids are not exceptional from this fact. There are lists of programs on the television or online courses on the internet or proliferated scientific resources which have been prepared by the development of technology. Moreover, this improvement accrues the children's understanding of their surroundings; inasmuch as, they possess a profound vision from the substances in their situation. By this deep inside vision, they are capable of providing the creative opinion about the different issues.
The next case embraced my idea is these facilities pave the path for children's imagination, while they can easily make their thoughts practical. It is eloquently explicit, by the improvement of technology the majority of the creative thoughts have altered to the actual subjects, and they do not store in the brain as the brilliant forgotten idea. In addition, by this tangible substance, the people are more likely to examine its failures and merits. These facilities for the sake of technology are available for the children too. They can use the various soft wares in the computer to visualize their imagination. A vivid example can be given to shed a light on the subject, is my brother's example. He is nine years old, and he is able to use the sketch up software on the computer. This program and his ability allow him to present his creative ideas in the computer and flourished by omitting its drawbacks.
The last indicator of my viewpoint's accuracy is the wide span of equipment which promotes the children's different abilities. If the concentration is focused in the past two decades our parents own a little chance and background to be accountable of their capabilities. On the other hand, in the modern period, there is a list of sophisticated facilities which distinguish the children's latent talent and explore it. These lists of facilities are shaped based on the deep vision obtained by the flourished technology. According to the noteworthy, intelligent research conducted at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), each four years a couple of technics and facilities are doubled and approximately they increase the sixty-one percent of children's creativities and the power of imaginations.
To wrap is up, based on the all aforementioned reasons one can logically draw the conclusion that today's' technology leads to more creative generation. Since it provides a chasm vision, it presents material consequence of the kids' thought, and it is an indicator of the potential talent of children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Tharwat | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | star435 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Isioma Nwayor | 70 | view |
- 1.The following appeared in the summary of a study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia."Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. Although many foods are naturally rich in salicyl 49
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the 66
- TPO 22-integrated writing 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. 78
- tpo 6 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
As some people may hold a view that todays technology ruins the childrens creativi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uch as the television, the internet, and the computer enhance the peoples intelle...
^^
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
... can logically draw the conclusion that todays technology leads to more creative gener...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'while', 'in addition', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25 0.229887763892 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.141304347826 0.158761421928 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0923913043478 0.0866891130778 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0289855072464 0.046263068375 63% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0579710144928 0.0685040099705 85% => OK
Prepositions: 0.11231884058 0.118717715034 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0326086956522 0.0351676179071 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.06757153112 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0217391304348 0.0309702414327 70% => OK
Particles: 0.0054347826087 0.00188951952338 288% => OK
Determiners: 0.141304347826 0.0887237588012 159% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0126811594203 0.0209618222197 60% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0126811594203 0.0139019557991 91% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3174.0 2387.08602151 133% => OK
No of words: 505.0 408.028673835 124% => OK
Chars per words: 6.28514851485 5.86048508987 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.384158415842 0.338922669872 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.334653465347 0.251872472559 133% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.267326732673 0.174417080927 153% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.190099009901 0.112833075102 168% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06757153112 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528712871287 0.524397521467 101% => OK
Word variations: 63.8565363882 59.2087087015 108% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6684587814 116% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0416666667 20.5533526081 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3324707997 48.84282405 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 120.699889404 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0416666667 20.5533526081 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.644075263715 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 54.5070132013 45.7405998639 119% => OK
Elegance: 1.73015873016 1.45489161554 119% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332977052801 0.300154397459 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0811126032601 0.103427244359 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.046731923019 0.0752933317313 62% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.579175698581 0.497263757937 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.118151987551 0.151897553556 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148479022973 0.114077575197 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469315420818 0.0781384742642 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.50210886557 0.336927656856 149% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.117658631223 0.067059652881 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239123044645 0.210909579961 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392221434174 0.0618886996521 63% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8870967742 151% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 15.0 8.42114695341 178% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.