Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
A person or peer becomes a leader when he or she stands out from the group by the virtue of some special traits. One such trait is the ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
The ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers for a leader is analogous to the ability of a football forward player's shot accuracy. He could have a good speed, stamina, strength but without accuracy, he won't be able to score. Respect often works on a give and take basis. A good leader is not someone who keeps expecting the work to be done and never gives anything back. Rather, a good leader is someone who gives all that he has - no matter how hard it is - and earns the trust and motivation of his peers. Likewise, respect works in a very similar fashion. The leader must respect his peers and be in a good position for his peers to respect him back. If this is the case, if he is not respected by his peers, then it simply means that he is not giving enough which also means he's failing.
A good leader always takes all the opinions and thoughts of his peers into consideration before deciding on anything that holds importance. That being said, if at times there's any confusions or a difference of opinion amongst the team, he must take the ultimate authority and take a solid decision. This decision that he takes, might not be acceptable by his peers if he's not respected enough. But this would work the other way, only if he maintains the respect of his peers. Having spoken about decisions, the team's morale also holds supreme value. If the team respects the leader, it believes the leader. That would lead to the peers working with utmost zeal and energy without any confusions in mind. On the flip side, if the team has doubts on the leader, then the energy goes down and hence directly affecting the team's performance. Let's take a scenario where a leader fails to maintain his respect. The leader here is a politician. Politicians often are directly compared with the term 'leader' and it becomes almost mandatory for a politician to be a good leader. If the leader of a political party is incredibly talented but fails to have the ability to maintain the respect of his party members, he will soon be replaced by a stronger leader who holds that ability. We've often seen this in real life too and fits in this scenario perfectly.
Coming to the part about moral judgement, at times sound moral judgements could be directly related to be able to maintain the respect as at times, peers tend to respect someone who is morally right. Being able to make solid moral judgements is one of the most sought after attributes or traits of a leader but, its definitely not as important as being respected. Let's assume another scenario where a leader is very good at moral judgement. He's probably going to be solid in his judgements, but is this going to help? The answer is no. The characteristic of 'sound moral judgement' might be a good attribute to have in the bucket, but who's going to oblige to the judgements if there is no respect to the leader. This clearly paves to the thesis of my analysis which is that - the ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers is more important than being able to make solid moral judgements.
On the whole, it is favorable if a leader has the ability to make moral judgements, but without the ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers, he won't be able to sustain.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | arpit6798 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 791, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
...e is not giving enough which also means hes failing. A good leader always take...
^^^
Line 9, column 170, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...mportance. That being said, if at times theres any confusions or a difference of opini...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 369, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
...might not be acceptable by his peers if hes not respected enough. But this would wo...
^^^
Line 9, column 512, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teams'' or 'team's'?
Suggestion: teams'; team's
...ers. Having spoken about decisions, the teams morale also holds supreme value. If the...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 820, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teams'' or 'team's'?
Suggestion: teams'; team's
...s down and hence directly affecting the teams performance. Lets take a scenario where...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 839, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...rectly affecting the teams performance. Lets take a scenario where a leader fails to...
^^^^
Line 9, column 951, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are often
...eader here is a politician. Politicians often are directly compared with the term leader ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1274, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: We've
...stronger leader who holds that ability. Weve often seen this in real life too and fi...
^^^^
Line 13, column 313, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...r attributes or traits of a leader but, its definitely not as important as being re...
^^^
Line 13, column 365, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ly not as important as being respected. Lets assume another scenario where a leader ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 442, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: He's
...leader is very good at moral judgement. Hes probably going to be solid in his judge...
^^^
Line 13, column 634, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...od attribute to have in the bucket, but whos going to oblige to the judgements if th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, likewise, so, then, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2813.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 624.0 442.535393258 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50801282051 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.99799879888 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43088362547 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.400641025641 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 882.9 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4938375798 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7419354839 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1290322581 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.74193548387 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 25.0 10.2758426966 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330879355538 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108313547592 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848415467648 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230162738812 0.150359130593 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331791670912 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 12.1639044944 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.