Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
A leader by definition, is a person who is chosen by the people to act as their guide for better lives and also who can stand out for them in time of need. So, a leader's most important characteristic is to maintain a good rapport with his or her people but at the same time, it is a leader's responsibility to guide his/her people to follow an ethical path.
An idealistic leader is someone who practices strong moral values and galvanize his or her peers in doing the same. If a leader himself or herself forgoes ethics then a whole bunch of people idolizing him or her will refuse to follow morals. A leader should be veracious to his or her people in conveying his or her principles and should be able to elucidate his or her goals and the path to achieve them. Since people become amenable when it comes to their leader, a leader should be able to persuade his or her peers to follow a righteous path to achieve their goals, which is one of the prime characteristic of a leader.
So, in my opinion, since a leader is idolized by many people around him or her, it is important for him or her to have a sound moral judgment as his or her judgment influences, he or she holds a responsibilty to guide his or her people with right path to fulfill their goals. He or She should be prudent when it comes to influencing people with his or her ideas for them. A leader should also be able to persuade his or her in following his or her ideas for the struggle to achieve a goal, if he or she fails to do so, it would be a failure for him or her as a leader because the primary quality a leader should possess is that he or she should be able to persuade his or her peers to agree to him or her no matter what.
Hence, for a leader to be effective should have a strong moral conscious along with maintaining the respect of his/her peers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | arpit6798 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through la 50
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 54
- The following appeared on the Mozart School of Music Web site The Mozart School of Music should be the first choice for parents considering enrolling their child in music lessons First of all the Mozart School welcomes youngsters at all ability and age le 66
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College a private institution to the college s governing committee 58
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...er people but at the same time, it is a leaders responsibility to guide his/her people ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'bunch'.
Suggestion: bunch
...imself or herself forgoes ethics then a whole bunch of people idolizing him or her will ref...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, as for, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 62.0 33.0505617978 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.20396600567 5.05705443957 83% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48037987926 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.399433427762 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.59117977528 82% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.7625237172 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.4 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.3 23.4991977007 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353234134413 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179530111481 0.0831039109588 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942441245256 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25723825757 0.150359130593 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216001258963 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.67 12.1639044944 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 100.480337079 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.