The bar graph provides illustration about the people who ate five parts of fruit and vegetables in a day between 2001 to 2008. Percentage of 3 types of people, that is, Female, Male and Children have shown for each year.
Overall it can be seen that there was increased in the percentage of people from 2001 to 2006 and thereafter it has decreased.
For the first 3 years, the proportion of Children and Men was constant and it was approximately 12% and 17% respectively. In the subsequent 3 years, that is, from 2003 to 2006, it has increased at a constant rate by around 4%. Children reached to its peak in 2007 at 22% and Men achieved its peak in 2006 at 27%. Percentages of both Man and Children have decreased in 2008.
The percentage of women who took fruits and vegetables are highest as compared to Men and Children. It starts at 21% and gradually increased to 33% in 2006 and decreased thereafter to 30% in 2008.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service be a compulsory part of high school programs for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 67
- The chart bellow shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 56
- The diagram below shows how geothemal energy is used to produce electricity. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Recent years, the number of crimes committed by young people in major cities throughout the world has been increasing. Why this has happened and how to deal with this problem? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55357142857 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71881801007 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.2454079537 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.0 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 5.23603664747 11% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236730963658 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10408823623 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115118529982 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165336278886 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914691713504 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.