Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Nowadays, technology has influenced all aspects of lives. Regard this fact, there is a controversial question expressing whether these changes compel children to be less creative than the past. I disagree with the opinion which is considering technology as a harmful tool for children. The reasons to substantiate my idea is explored in the following.
To begin with, not being accessible information for people in the past, was an unfavorable event which deprives, today. To put on the other hand, before some kinds of technology like the internet or computer, people faced a lot of difficulties in finding their requirements. However, today everything is available on the internet and everyone can find their requisites on the internet. A personal experience of mine can drive this fact home, I am going to speak about my father who used to buy his book from a library far from our home. He had been buying his books, for several years, until my brother asked him to tell the name of a book which he needs. After a while, my brother indicated the book on the computer that my father had given him for his birthday. Actually, after this event, my father neither be in traffic nor lose his time and had time to be more creative in his job.
Furthermore, innovation is an interesting opportunity which makes it different between now and the past. To be specific, children can learn a lot of things with the help of technology and this lets them be more effective and innovative in the future. Teachers could not use some features like video or computers in the past, but now these are the parts of education. As an illustration, my brother has gone to high school for four years. Once upon a time, while my grandfather was trying to turn on his old television, my brother started to use the internet and found the solution in it. After that, we noticed they had participated in a class which is about how to use technology for solving problems. If my brother had never taken part in that class, my grandfather would have his problem with his television until now.
In conclusion, I do believe technology has positive effects on the children of a new era. Since preparing them for accessing a lot of information also help them to be more effective and more innovative.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 90 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | yuktapradeep | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | theprasad | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | fanassertive | 71 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | weiwei | 70 | view |
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 75
- "Most homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last heating season that region experienced 90 days with below-normal temperatures, and climate forecasters predi 69
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 83
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 58
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favoriterecreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits,however, and the city park department devotes little 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7398989899 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77721757436 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54797979798 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9157946195 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.85 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144981209355 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494193241252 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065153901731 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116381851212 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930640482658 0.0645574589148 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.