A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Obviously, education and planning for students in order to improve their skills and learning lessons is one of the most important issues for governments. Despite this fact, there is a controversial question that expressing is the government should perform same scheme for all students until entering college or not. In my opinion this strategy isn’t very useful and I disagree with that. The reasons to substantiate my view point are explored in the following.
To begin with, same educational methods and one kind of lesson will deteriorate students’ talent. To put in the other hand, when schools don’t teach innovation and new things, they don’t let student to indicate their talents. It is crystal clear, governments have responsibility to find new talented students and introduce them to society and this plan has influence on students’ potential. To easily perceive this word consider a forest which every animals have to learn how to swim in that forest, fishes always are successful and lions never can show its power.
Furthermore, each city has own culture and students of that area have to get familiar with the zone culture, however, other persons don’t necessarily need to know about that culture. To be specific every areas want to preserve their culture and the best way to do that is teaching the culture to children. Surely, same lessons in all cities of a country isn’t going to be beneficial and make problems. Let consider an example to derive this fact home, Isfahan is a major city in traditional music and Qum is an important city in religious issue, what happens if these two city can’t teach their important tradition culture to new students of their area.
Without any shadow of doubt, studying similarly in all part of country has positive effects. It is true, some lessons are important to anyone and everyone has to have a primitive knowledge about these types of lessons such as art, sport and math. To make my point of view clear, regard a singer who can’t calculate some simple mathematical question or a professor doesn’t know anything about sport.
In conclusion, I believe same plan for every students in a country isn’t beneficial. Since it makes problems in finding new talented students and also don’t give the opportunity to cities to teach their traditional culture. However, individual has to get familiar with something like math, art and sport which this strategy has done it very well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 76
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 75
- Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. 80
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...doesn't know anything about sport. In conclusion, I believe same plan for e...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch this strategy has done it very well.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, well, as to, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14778325123 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81351521996 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549261083744 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7212215209 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.111111111 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11973447474 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433931699298 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519239705143 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714017728115 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342601065677 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.