The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.
The line graph illustrates the difference in the amount of passengers using the below - surface station as their transportation. It is clear that the outstanding trend was increased through the day with significant fluctuation.
Overall, during the first 12 hours from 6.00, the figures exhibit an erratic pattern in which experienced a decline ones afterward.
Commencing at 100 people, the number of customers shoot up, and reached its peak at four-times higher than the initial statistics after 3 hours before diminishing to almost a half at 10 o'clock. The amount of riders gradually rose to approximately 300 between the next 2 hours, followed by a considerable fall of 200 and finalized at commenced number. The figures then rocketed to nearly 400 at 18.00.
Since 18.00, the statistics witnessed a remarkable depletion to 125 in the following 2 hours before slightly climb to just under 150 at 22.00. It is noticeable that the trends between 6.00 to 10.00 and 16.00 to 20.00 had insignificant differences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-03 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 84
- Global Warming 56
- The pie chart shows which weight range of the adult population 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... pattern in which experienced a decline ones afterward. Commencing at 100 pe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h experienced a decline ones afterward. Commencing at 100 people, the number of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 187, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: o'clock
...fore diminishing to almost a half at 10 oclock. The amount of riders gradually rose to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25609756098 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05981988103 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.719512195122 0.547539520022 131% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1012390706 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.073888830295 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353743150122 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645379515326 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.047213996302 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058268707187 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.