Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world, unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures.
To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
In this contemporary epoch, pilgrimages play part and parcel role in every country. Therefore, it has become the biggest industry in the world. Regrettably, few people rely on international tourism to make trouble rather than understanding between folks from different cultures. I totally disagree with this notion and I am going to explore my viewpoints before reaching a reasonable summation.
There is an abundance of the benefits of tourism, travelers are exploring host countries' heritage places and also the tradition in this modern world. Therefore, those are too polite inhabitants, who reveal their good etiquette. Moreover, traversing spending their hard-earned money to another nation. These kinds of work help a lot in a country, which country has many numbers of tourism rates.
Secondly, the inheritances of any country are a precious part of their country, after elucidate by tourism it makes more eminent. Travelers show decent behavior to other folks, it had dropped an adequate impact on other countries' masses. Therefore, mostly traversing's inhabitants are acknowledged of these kinds of manners, then it cannot make trouble alloying in folks. Moreover, in their distinguished intellectual.
Despite it, there are some of the masses certain have the worst intention and habits which they got from their host country. Likewise, using vulgar words, producing pollution, against authorities created a system, sadly, these kinds of things done by pilgrimage, however, governments have to be strict rather than avoiding it because of tourists has an immense effect to every country.
To sum up that, through jaunting, every region is getting numerous positive impacts on their GDP. Authorities should be the concern of traversing and also Apply some crucial precautions to travelers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | Dhruv8807 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | D87eepak | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | IVANTRUONG | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | Dishant | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | asdfgzxcvb | 84 | view |
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household, and the table shows the amount of electricity used according to the number of occupants. Smmerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp 84
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors' contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restauranta between 2003 and 2013Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make camparisons where relevent. 67
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household, and the table shows the amount of electricity used according to the number of occupants. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make com 84
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors' contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 23, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ntellectual. Despite it, there are some of the masses certain have the worst intention...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58844765343 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91096981422 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649819494585 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.5327189944 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.75 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165547362481 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517033360801 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958434445171 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868041856077 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101971663182 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.